David Ortiz did it again tonight.

In the bottom of the ninth with two outs and two on and the Red Sox down by two runs, he hit a game-winning walk-off three run homer to win the game, 9-8.

It was his fifth walk-off hit of the year, his 12th in four seasons with the Red Sox (the most in the Majors in that span), and the 8th walk-off home run in his career.

The amazing thing was, everyone was expecting him to hit that home run, and he did.  It was almost anti-climactic because it was just they way you thought things would happen.

The man is a complete freak of nature at this point.  For years, statisticians have been attempting to quantify the elusive batting trait known as “clutch hitting.”  But no matter which way they ran the numbers, they always came up with the same result – clutch hitting did not exist. Players were no more or less likely to get a hit in “clutch” situations than they were in any other at bat.  When you really think about it, this makes sense – if a player could really get a hit or home run on command, why wouldn’t he do that in every at bat?

Although these guys tend to question everything and retest every assertion from every angle, the stat-heads had finally run enough tests to the point were they basically all agreed that clutch hitting did not exist.  But then along came David Ortiz’s amazing run in the 2004 post season, and his possibly even more amazing 2005 season, when 20 of his home runs either tied the game or put the Red Sox ahead (by comparison, Manny only had a tiny handful of such home runs, which is not a knock against Manny, really, as his numbers conform to what would be expected through random chance).

This remarkable run by Ortiz prompted one of the leading stat-head organizations, Baseball Prospectus to reexamine the whole idea of clutch hitting, and try yet one more time to see if they could find some evidence of clutch hitting.  Basically, they invented a very complicated stat called “Leverage” which assigned a number to each possible game situation based on the expected increase in the chance of the team winning the game if a batter got various kinds of hits in that situation. They then compared the number of wins players provided to the team in those situations (as measured by the total increase in win chance their actual hits provided) as compared with the number of wins they would have been expected to provide if they had hit evenly across all situations according to their overall season numbers.

They were thus able to show that David Ortiz provided the Red Sox with an extra 3.6 wins more than he “should have” by getting an extremely disproportionate part of his season numbers in at bats that were the most important to winning a game.  By comparing expected wins to actual wins, they found that including “clutch hitting” made their model of “expected wins” two percent more accurate. In other words, clutch hitting does exist, but it only accounts for maybe 2 percent of a team’s wins.

It certainly helps that David Ortiz is in the lineup he is in, with two low-power, high-OBP guys in front of him in Youkilis and Loretta and Manny batting behind him, giving him a lot of chances to hit with men on base.

It also helps that Ortiz happens to be hotter than the sun right now no matter what the situation is, having hit 14 home runs in July alone along with 35 RBI.

But still, watching Ortiz day in and day out, there is simply something about him since October of 2004 that goes against all reason and into the realm of the uncanny and preternatural.  He really does seem to only make outs when it doesn’t matter so much, in blowouts or when his team is already ahead (or as Baseball Prospectus would say, in “low Leverage at-bats”).  And he really does seem to deliver time and time again when it matters most. He actually hit two home runs today, and his first homer, what do you know, it tied the game up for the Red Sox.

The final walk-off-homer was unfolding on ESPN’s national telecast while “Baseball Tonight” was live on the air, and you could see all the Baseball Tonight analysts laughing with disbelief. Then they began drooling all over Big Papi.  Even to the point where John Kruk, who has adamantly stated in the past that a DH should never be named MVP, publicly recanted on the air:

“You guys know how I feel about a DH being MVP, but it gets to a point were the stats are so slanted in favor of a DH that, I have to say it, David Ortiz is the MVP of the American League.”

It is getting really, really hard to disagree.

No Responses to “David Ortiz is Clearly an Alien From another Planet”

  1. Not to take anything away from everyon’es favorite hefty hero, but there are two more factors at play:

    #1- Every time he comes up (or even into the on deck circle) when the game is on the line, the game HAS to change for pitchers. His “clutch” performances are noted by late relievers who rely on intimidating mound presences, steely nerves and more confidence than any other players on the team. Papi’s walk-offs are gaining exponential momentum in a way, because pitchers absolutely fear him, and when this happens, they are unable to bare down and pitch “their game”. (Timid pitchers always get torched.) This reminds me of Barry Bonds in 2001 in this respect. Yeah, the guy is scorching, and when a hitter gets locked in like this, pitchers try too hard while getting away frm the things that make them successful. I think it matters.

    #2- Papi should be tested for the performance enhancing substance, “PMS”- Papi’s Mango Salsa. Its clearly giving him an edge.

  2. I’m one of those stat-heads who don’t believe in the existence of “clutch-hitting”. Actually, let me rephrase that. I believe in clutch hits. You see them a lot. I don’t believe in any innate ability to produce them. David Ortiz is a top three hitter in the bigs. But I’m with Jeb’s first point on this one. Pitchers want nothing to do with Ortiz in close and late situations. The idea of his clutchness has grown to titanic proportions and it enters into the pitchers’ collective psyche. But with Manny Ramirez behind him, they feel compelled to throw strikes, and they make mistakes. Ortiz is good enough to capitalize on them. I know it makes Ortiz sound human to say this, which may be blasphemous in Red Sox Nation, but he IS human. He does appear to have the ability to focus under pressure, but I don’t think that he becomes Superman in certain situations. The pitchers, on the whole, deflate. Fausto Carmona is still a rookie. It was actually his first save opp of his entire career. And he was facing David Ortiz. The ingredients were there for the walkoff. Ortiz took advantage.

  3. Sarah Green says:

    Clearly, any single walkoff situation can be rationalized. But taken as a whole, David’s entire body of clutch work is very impressive. As Nick noted, aside from having planet Krypton as his birthplace, Ortiz has guys batting in front of him who get on base and Manny behind him.

    Yeah, most teams usually bring in a lefty to face Ortiz. Yeah, most teams usually try to put some sort of shift on him. But it doesn’t seem to matter.

    And yeah, when Papi *doesn’t* come through in the clutch, Joe and Jerry don’t scream into their microphones, “And David Ortiz FAILS to come through! Again!”

    But all the same, David in the middle of a very special season here. And if it looks like a clutch hitter and it smells like a clutch hitter, I say it’s a clutch hitter. What else would you call someone who racks up clutch hit after clutch hit?

  4. Sarah Green says:

    Here’s an interesting update from Boston.com’s “Extra Bases”:

    August 01, 2006

    Papi really does do it every time

    By Gordon Edes, Globe Staff

    It’s not an illusion that David Ortiz comes through in walkoff situations every time.

    According to Sox historian Allan Wood, webmaster of the Joy of Sox, Ortiz has come to the plate 19 times in potential walkoff situations since the end of the 2004 regular season (postseasons included) and reached base 16 times. He is 11-for-14 (.786), with 7 HR and 20 RBI.

    In 2005 and 2006, he is 8-for-9, with 5 HR and 15 RBI!


  5. The thing about Papi is this, pitchers pitch to him knowing Manny at any moment can do just as much damage if not more. But IMO Manny lacks the heart to do it. If you flip their spots in the lineup (which looking at batting averages you should be able to do) you probably get worse results. I’d walk Papi to pitch to Manny any time.

  6. Also, let’s face it, Papi at first makes any grounder into a possible DP.

    Not to knock his base-stealing abilities!


  7. Sarah Green says:

    Goddammit! I know the ball is under here somewhere…

  8. Sarah Green says:

    Casey Blake felt this was an excellent time to try to combine downward-facing dog with the scorpion pose.

  9. Coley Ward says:

    He’s no Wizard: Casey Blake’s attempt at an Ozzie Smith-style backflip went horribly, horribly wrong.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]