The news today was that the MLB / DirecTV deal was finalized.

Refusing to even give it a glimpse, I braced for a season of late-night box-score reading.

Naturally, I gave in, and searched for a news report about the deal. Couldn’t find it on NYT, didn’t see it quickly enough on ESPN.COM. What the hell, let’s just get it straight from the horse’s mouth.

From an MLB.COM Press Release:

Major League Baseball and DIRECTV, the nation’s leading satellite provider, today announced a seven-year agreement that continues carriage rights to the MLB EXTRA INNINGS subscription package of out-of-market games and includes the launch of the MLB Channel as part of DIRECTV’s basic package. Included within the agreement, DIRECTV will be a minority partner in the MLB Channel, and will work with MLB to develop the network, which will launch in 2009.

Additionally, in keeping with MLB’s desire to provide as much MLB programming to as many baseball fans as possible, MLB and DIRECTV have agreed to include a provision that allows MLB EXTRA INNINGS to be offered to other incumbents – In Demand and DISH Network – at consistent rates and carriage requirements with a deal to be concluded before the baseball season begins. The provision also requires the incumbents to agree to carriage rights to the MLB Channel proportionally equivalent to DIRECTV’s commitment. Should the incumbents decide not to match DIRECTV’s commitment, the MLB EXTRA INNINGS package will be exclusive to DIRECTV. All out of market games continue to be available on

Is that right? Am I reading correctly? Does that say what I think it says?

Well, after carefully examining the press release, what I think I got out of it is that both DirecTV and MLB will include some kind of provision in their deal that invites In Demand and Dish to carry the Extra Innings package at the same rate DirecTV decides to set and if they agree to carry the new MLB channel.

This means there will be a new negotiation round that has to conclude before the season starts.

If In Demand and/or Dish do not match DirecTV’s “commitment” (think boatloads of cash), or do not agree to carry the channel, only then will the deal be exclusive.

Smart move, Selig, now you’ve turned the deal completely on its head. Not only do you open the whole thing up, but you then up the ante and put In Demand and Dish on the spot for not wanting to carry the MLB channel. So the pressure’s on them now.

Very smart.

Too bad most everyone realizes that you’re basically twisting the Cable companies’ arm; whilst giving all of us non-DTV people a big fat $700 million-sized finger.

From the AP:

The president of one of those providers, iN Demand’s Robert Jacobson, immediately said those terms were impossible for his company to agree to and called it a “de facto exclusive deal.”

UPDATE 03/09 11:42 a.m.: The fallout has begun.

– Baseball Bends on TV Deal; But Doubts Linger – []

– MLB Pretends It Cares, A Little, Barely – []

– The Real Deal on “Extra Innings” – [CNBC]

7 Responses to “MLB, DTV reach deal; polygamy clause causes jeers”

  1. forager says:

    Great, so we’re still screwed… so I guess it’s time to find someone who has the dish and buy them a slingbox for xmas :-)

  2. Alejandro Leal says:

    You’re right!!

    Except, of course, we do know how MLB’s New Media Goons feel about that little appliance.

  3. Honey. Baby. Sweetie. Don’t get a Lowell shirt. He’s gone after this season and you’ll be stuck once again with someone not on the team. Until they come out with a Rice or Remdog shirt. I fully endorse Wakefield.

  4. Of course they don’t, both written and implied! But as you mentioned in that article, there isn’t anything they can do about, for now…

  5. I just found out about the slingbox two weeks ago. Why was I the last guy to find out about that wonderful application?

  6. Coley Ward says:

    Now, I’m a phillies fan, but I live in Atlanta. So if I want to watch the Phillies games w/o getting DirecTV, my best bet is to get my Philly-based parents a sling box so that they can hook it up to their TV and send their TV signal (including Phillies games) to my computer, right? B/c Phillies games aren’t broadcast often in Atlanta.

  7. Yea, I think that’ll work.

    Actually, I’m sure that’ll work.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]