• HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian....

This morning I received an email from my boss regarding eye-tracking research done by the Online Journalism Review from the USC Annenberg Center for Communications, to measure where people focus on when reading websites.

Part of my job is to help my online team come up with better design strategies so that our sites look better.

Even though we gather and consume tons of data and source material that relates to design and usability, some of it may or may not stick.

The link I received this morning dealt with news article design, and images used within those articles.

It seems there’s a distinction as to how men and women look at images; as an example, the OJR used an image of former KC Royals’ great George Brett.

Here’s the image combined with eye-tracking data:

image7.gif

When photos do contain people related to the task at hand, or the content users are exploring, they do get fixations. However, gender makes a distinct difference on what parts of the photo are stared at the longest. Take a look at the hotspot below.

Although both men and women look at the image of George Brett when directed to find out information about his sport and position, men tend to focus on private anatomy as well as the face. For the women, the face is the only place they viewed.

This image of George Brett was part of a larger page with his biographical information. All users tested looked the image, but there was a distinct difference in focus between men and women.

So does this mean that every time men watch baseball, we’re really looking for …bats and balls?

8 Responses to “Eye-fixation 101”

  1. Coley Ward says:

    “I just remembered, I’m allergic to the barbeque seeds!”

  2. I SEE DEAD PEOPLE.

  3. Nick Kapur says:

    The Fourth Little Pig soon regretted building his house out of sunflower seeds when Big, Bad Bobby came to blow it down.

  4. anyone notice the snot on the lens?

    Gross…

  5. Coley Ward says:

    So I wonder, are men obsessed with other guys’ junk in general, or just George Brett’s junk?

  6. Sarah Green says:

    I have to say, I disagree with the research findings to some extent. The report omits discussion of the mysterious yellow blob on George Brett’s shoulder in the women’s study. Clearly, the face is *not* the only place the women viewed. Hellooo deltoids!

  7. The guys are looking at where his swing will be, visualizing where contact would be made. That it happens to be the groin area is purely coincidental.

  8. Alejandro Leal says:

    Yea!!

    I can’t understand why these scientists don’t get it right!

Leave a Reply

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]