• HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian....

It’s pretty clear that nobody has any idea who will win this year’s World Series. The Angels are a trendy pick. Ditto with the Mets and Red Sox. Of course the Yankees are always a contender. But, as last season taught us, you just never know.

Ryan Zimmerman, being held back by his teammates.Fortunately, it’s much easier to predict who the worst team in the league will be. This year, the choice is almost unanimous: the Washington Nationals.

How bad will the Nats be? That’s debatable. Buster Olney reported recently that some scouts think the Nats could lose as many as 130 games. That would be impressive.

Recently, fellow Umpbumper Nick, who is currently on a whirlwind tour of the Grapefruit League, said that he thought the Nationals opening day lineup was one of the worst in history.

But not everybody is so down on the Nats. From today’s Washington Post:

With less than a week before Opening Day, the Nats don’t look as lousy in Florida as they might prefer. “That No. 1 overall draft pick may be gone already,” laughed a Nats exec. “How about No. 3?”

Shawn Hill has a 0.96 ERA in five starts. Rookie lefty Matt Chico is ahead of schedule for a rotation spot. Jerome Williams (3.38 ERA) always had a fine arm. John Patterson hasn’t fallen into a manhole yet. The bullpen’s deep. Cristian Guzman, still only 29, is 16 for 36. Was the shoulder injury that cost him the ’06 season part of the reason he hit .219 in ’05? If so, did the Nats just rediscover the shortstop from three Twins playoff teams? It’s only exhibitions, but versatile Kory Casto, shortstop Josh Wilson, outfielder Chris Snelling and catcher Jesus Flores (Rule 5) all look like big league hitters. And solid utilityman Ronnie Belliard fell into the Nats’ hands. That’s a lot of positives for one spring training. “Hysteria was premature,” Kasten said.

Is it possible that the Nationals are going to be better than we thought? Could the Nats be this year’s Cinderella team, the way the Marlins were in 2006?

It seems like a stretch. Last year’s Marlins team was based around a core of young, talented players. It was a youth movement. This year’s Nats team looks like the cast from Major League. It’s a group of mostly veteran castoffs, with the exception of the young and extremely talented Ryan Zimmerman.

Still, if you want a reason to believe, just look to the bright lights of Las Vegas:

Las Vegas has noticed. Scouts were recently quoted as saying the Nats were so bad they could lose 130. Talk’s cheap. The smart money disagrees. The over-under for the Nats is 68-94 — just three more loses than last year.

Only three more losses than last year, after losing Alfonso Soriano, Jose Vidro, and Nick Johnson for at least half the season, would be a major moral victory. But don’t hold your breath. It’s likely this team will be more like the 2006 Royals than the 2006 Marlins. And they might be even worse than that.

One Response to “So how bad are the Nats?”

  1. Nick Kapur says:

    Yeah, anyone who thinks the Nats even have a chance to lose 130 games just doesn’t understand how baseball works. Baseball is pretty much a .500 game. It is extremely difficult to win more than 65% of your games, but it is also extremely and equally difficult to lose more than 65%, no matter how bad a team is. Baseball prospectus has run statistics on this to show how it becomes harder and harder to either win or lose additional games after 105 wins/losses or so. It basically took a sort of perfect storm of losing for the ’62 Mets to lose 120. I’m not sure that feat will ever be duplicated.

Leave a Reply

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]