• HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian....

You know what I don’t get? Why is it that when a National League player gets traded to an American League team, or visa versa, he starts from scratch (statistically speaking)?

For example, Julio Lugo was traded at last year’s deadline from the Devil Rays to the Dodgers, and his stats on ESPN.com read like this:

TBD AL  73  289   17  1  12   27  18  4  27  47  .308  .373  .498
LAD NL  49  146    5  1   0   10   6  5  12  29  .219  .278  .267

I understand why, prior to interleague play, we kept a player’s National League and American League stats separate. The two leagues were very different beasts. But why have we kept doing it?

Some of the hits Lugo got as a Devil Ray last year came against National League teams. And some of the (very few) hits he got as a Dodger came against American League teams. So why not just combine his 2006 stats? Does that make too much sense?

4 Responses to “I don’t get it.”

  1. Maybe cause they play by different rules?

  2. Paul Moro says:

    I’m not saying it’s a valid argument to claim this, but I do think that year-end awards have something to do with it. Can you call someone an AL homerun king if they hit half their home runs in the NL prior to a deadline trade?

    Primarily, I do agree that it’s outdated. It goes back to a time when the NL and AL were still thought of as different entities and not just under the main umbrella of MLB.

  3. Coley Ward says:

    No! That can’t be it. B/c now, thanks to interleague play, NL players play in games where the DH is used. And AL players play in games where pitchers hit.

    And as far as I’m aware, that’s the only rule that is different between the NL and AL. Right?

  4. Sarah Green says:

    Actually, ESPN splits up all of a player’s stats when he gets traded mid-season, whether he changes leagues or not. This is to see how many games he had with each team and how he performed on each team, which is actually a very useful metric. Coley, you know I love you, but I think this rant is all a lot of strutting and fretting, signifying nothing. Sorry.

Leave a Reply

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]