In his column today, Baltimore Sun sports writer David Steele argues that we need to worry less about the impact that steroids are having on the record books and more with the damage that they are doing to people’s lives.

Steele says we need to concern ourselves less with Bonds and more with Benoit, the testosterone-fueled wrestler who recently killed his wife and son, before hanging himself. Steele says we’ve lost touch with what’s important and he ends his piece with this damning sentiment:

Let’s reset our priorities. Let’s argue about whether Selig should be at Chris Benoit’s son’s funeral.

Oh snap! He went there!

It’s great that Steele is so concerned with the kids, especially considering the fact that steroids are these days.But I think Steele is in desperate need of a refresher course. Maybe we should send him back to Steroids 101.

You see, David, we don’t have any real reason to suspect that Barry Bonds, Gary Sheffield, or any other player is currently using steroids, because MLB tests for steroids. We do have reason to suspect that they are on HGH, because that’s the stuff they’ve been linked to in the past, and because MLB doesn’t test for HGH.

Now, there’s still a lot of uncertainty about the risks associated with HGH, but we have no reason to believe that it causes violent outbursts. There’s no reason to think that baseball will ever experience something like what happened with Benoit. If baseball’s testing program works, then steroids and roid rage should be a thing of the past.

But HGH fueled home run mashers are still very much a thing of the present. And as long as there is no testing for that drug, the sanctity of MLB’s records will be under attack.

That’s why we boo Barry. And we’re right to do it. Because– at least in the MLB — we’ve won the war on steroids. Now we’re fighting the war against HGH, and it’s the future of the game that’s at stake.

Mr. Steele, you can argue that caring about baseball records at a time when wrestlers are killing their families is trivial if you want, but coming from a guy who writes about sports for a living, that rings a little hollow.

No Responses to “Roid debate rages on”

  1. Just cause I’m biased..could it be Seaver?

  2. El Esteroide says:

    I’m going with Dave Steib

  3. Robert Person? Ha, just kidding. How about…um…Sandy Koufax?

  4. Nick Kapur says:

    The Steroid wins – it was Dave Stieb. I added a bit about Stieb in the actual post.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]