Last week, the New York Yankees dodged the perception that they wanted to fire their long-time manager Joe Torre by giving him a low-ball offer that they most likely knew would be rejected.

The organization’s rationale for the one-year offer went something like this: For the New York Yankees, anything short of a World Series victory is a failure. Joe Torre had failed to reach that goal for the past seven years straight. This is unacceptable. From the NY Times following Torre’s departure became official:

”The point is, the objective of the Yankees since the ’20s has been to win a championship every year, just like the objective of Lombardi with the Packers or Belichick with the Patriots,” Hank Steinbrenner said.

”Our goal is to win it every single year, even though we know, obviously, you can’t win it every single year. But nothing less than a championship is considered really acceptable.”

Fine. If you want to be elitist, be elitist. We expect nothing less from the Yankees. But if that was truly your rationale as to why Torre deserved a big paycut, at least be consistent.

Here’s what Hank Steinbrenner said a couple days ago while speaking to reporters:

“I think the most important thing is, whoever we hire (as the next manager), give ’em a chance because he’s not getting the ’96 Yankees. He’s getting an even younger team and, for the most part, a team in transition. Give him a little while.”

“We want to win the World Series every year,” Hank said. “We’re not stupid enough to think we can do it.”

Huh? Since when do the Yankees have teams “in transition”?  Also note the slight dig on Torre. Hank’s alluding that Torre was given a championship team on a platter when he took over in 1996, but that this won’t be the case for his successor in 2008, which is of course ridiculous. The Yankees will have a championship calibre team in 2008. I’m not sure how Hank can try to make it seem like this is not the case.

Look, I understand why Torre was basically let go. But I do not understand how ownership can backtrack so quickly. If Torre failed by not bringing home a championship in 2007, why should the new manager be held to a different standard? Is it the salary? Or is it that Hank will personally have a hand in hiring the new guy and doesn’t want to be criticized if it does’t pay immiedate dividends? 

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]