Ahhhh the memories.

I’ve been to Nashville. Nice town. I hope the GMs currently meeting there** are enjoying the various honky tonks and watering holes. But in between all the fun live music and delightfully fried foods, I hope they are talking serious, blockbuster trades. I am so over the A-Rod thing. The free agent crop this year is just not where the action is. Plus, there are a couple of other interesting tidbits floating around the GM Meetings:

1. This year, the 30 general managers decided to try something so obvious they couldn’t believe they didn’t think of it sooner. At the behest of Red Sox GM Theo Epstein and Marlins President Larry Beinfest, all 30 GMs got together for an informal meeting at which each GM explained, in two minutes or less, what his acquisition goals were and what kind of deals he was willing to entertain. Under the old system, scouts and other emissaries would be dispatched by one club to sound out the other 29 clubs in turn, like royal pages in some 17th century court. And like some 17th century royal court, rumors and gossip abounded while real information was scarce.

2. In another great leap forward, GMs have voted 25-5 for umpires to use instant replay to determine debatable fair-or-foul judgments and home run calls. As has been widely reported, it would work more like the NHL’s system, where a neutral third party reviews the play in a booth upstairs, than the NFL’s system of formal challenges that then get reviewed by the referees themselves. In the past, Commissioner Bud Selig has said he doesn’t like using instant replay in part “because of all the delays.” He’s even talked about speeding up the games by limiting the number of times the batter can step out of the batters’ box and cutting down on catcher’s trips to the mound. That is bad news for fans, who might have been hoping Quixotically for shorter commercial breaks instead.

3 . Here’s some fun trade speculation—the Rangers are looking for a centerfielder (again) to fill in for the two-to-three years it will take their best outfield prospects to mature. One option they’ve discussed is Coco Crisp. The Boston Globe reports that the Red Sox expressed interest in one of the Rangers’ catchers, either Gerald Laird or (ha ha) Jarrod Saltalamacchia. Laird-for-Coco wouldn’t be a good move for Boston. Laird hit in the low .200s with 9 homers in 120 games last season. It should be noted, however, that Laird led the league in throwing out would-be base-stealers; if he can catch a knuckler, the Sox might be interested in him to catch Tim Wakefield (though they tried this experiment before, and ended up paying an extremely high price to bring back Doug Mirabelli when it faltered). I think Salty-for-Coco is just wishful thinking on the part of the Globe, unless the Red Sox were willing to throw some cash or some prospects (or both) at Texas. After all, he’s a burly, young, switch-hitting catcher (not unlike Jason Varitek 12 years ago) and those don’t come cheap (unless the other GM is an idiot and you’re offering the great Heathcliff Slocumb). What would the Red Sox do with Salty? He’s not known for his defensive prowess behind the plate, which is an issue because the back-up catcher in Beantown pretty much has to catch Wake’s flutterball. It’s possible that the Red Sox are looking ahead to the days when Varitek becomes their bench coach (oh please, let it come to pass!) but right now, Saltalamacchia doesn’t fit any needs the Red Sox have….OR DOES HE? One of the rumors going around is that if the Red Sox can’t re-sign Mike Lowell, they’ll move Gold Glove-winning first baseman Kevin Youkilis to third (his former position) and get themselves a new first baseman. And Saltalamacchia has some experience at first. And before you go jumping on me that Coco is too old or too expensive to be the centerpiece of such a deal, I remind you that he’s only 28 and he only makes $4 million. Plus, he’s got great speed. The only downside here is that he’s coming off of a couple poor offensive years with the Red Sox (which, in turn, could actually make him cheaper to sign for the Rangers, if they’re willing to take a chance on him returning to his respectable career average of .280).

4. The Yankees are talking trades as well, and also looking to move one of their outfielders. They’ve talked about shopping Johnny Damon, though that is looking unlikely at this moment, and there have been murmurs about moving Hideki Matsui, though he has a no-trade clause and could be hard to unload. And, as far as I can tell, no possible takers for either of those has been mentioned. One problem for the Yanks seems to be that they’ve got too many DH-types—including a ravaged-by-years-of-steroid-use Jason Giambi, whose “skills” at first base we last saw harming his team in the playoffs.

5. At the new “straight from the horse’s mouth” GM roundtable discussed above, Indians GM Mark Shapiro said he wasn’t shopping anyone, but no one was off-limits if the right offer came along. He’s said to be preparing a contract extension for C.C. Sabathia. But given what C.C. is likely to cost, he might be tempted to move the Cy Young favorite now and just rake in his winnings. Who would possible takers be? Why, pretty much every team out there with something—-anything—to offer. I can’t think of a GM who wouldn’t empty his cupboard and open his wallet at the chance to get Sabathia.

**I am an ass. The GM meetings are being held in Orlando, where I have also been and where, unless you are seven years old and meeting Mickey Mouse in his dressing room, it sort of sucks. The Winter Meetings (held in December) are in Nashville. Thanks to reader Melissa for pointing this out.

5 Responses to “Bits and Pieces from Nashville or rather, Orlando”

  1. Sarah, if the Sox get Salty for Coco, then the Rangers franchise ought to be contracted. That would be a horrible, horrible trade for Texas. They just traded Mark Teixeira, who is a bonefide all-star, for Salty. And now they’re going to turn around and deal Salty for Coco Crisp, who will never, EVER, make an all-star team?

    The only way Texas deals Salty to the Sox is if they get Ellsbury, Lester, or an equally talented young player in return.

  2. Sarah Green says:

    Well, Coley, the Red Sox aren’t shopping Ellsbury. That’s the whole point of dumping Crisp. Plus, you’ll note that I already said above that there was no way the Rangers would accept a one-to-one trade of Crisp for Saltalamacchia. However, the Red Sox have plenty of younger prospects to offer the Rangers, including pitchers, as part of a package with Crisp. I only see them sending pitching the Rangers’ way, however, if they wanted to use Salty as a full-time player in the immediate future, which I don’t, really, given Varitek’s incumbency. I would actually think (since the Globe couldn’t tell *which* Texas catcher the inquiry was about) that you might see a trade of Crisp for Rangers’ prospect Taylor Teagarden, their 8th-ranked prospect. He’s a young catcher regarded as having great defensive ability and some offensive potential, and he could be ready just in time for Tek’s retirement.

  3. Coco for a prospect like Teagarden makes much more sense.

  4. Jojo Fireball says:

    A couple of things I agree with, and a couple I think are absurd…

    First of all, Salty is an all star within the next two years… Mark my words. The only reason he wasn’t starting behind the plate in Atlanta is because Brian McCann didn’t get out for the first two months of the year. Coco is solid defensively and maybe exactly what Texas needs to compliment the pop they already have in their lineup, but he would have to be setup in a package deal with cash and some heavy duty young arms from Boston to pull Salty out of Texas…

    Secondly, I’m not sure what reports you’re reading on Taylor Teagarden but I am looking at 2007 stats for 110 games combined from Hi A and AA and I am seeing 27 jacks with 90 steaks… From my standpoint that’s a tab better than minor to average offensive potential. He is actually older than Salty but the reason he isn’t starting for a major league right now is because he spent three years at The University of Texas winning a national championship or two. But mark my words he’ll be a perennial all star soon as well…

    And C, Salty and Teagraden can both flat out rake… Boston would be LUCKY to have either of these guys coming in with their respective potential and losing only Coco whose spot would be filled more than adequately by Jacoby Ellsbury… If Jon Daniels is truly entertaining offers like this then Tom Hicks’ experiment of hiring a 28 year old gm has started to go South very early…

    And I really don’t even want to warrant the Laird rumors with a response but I’ll just say that Gerald Laird, in my opinion will be a bench coach roughly about the same time that Tek will be…

  5. Sarah Green says:

    Jojo, no one is saying “only Coco” for Saltalamacchia. I think we all agree that Coco would have to go with prospects and probably cash considerations as well.

    As for Teagarden, he’s also spent signif time coming back from Tommy John surgery according to BP’s report on him. Yes, he’s a great prospect, but he has yet to break Triple A and he’s not quite the stud Salty is. I don’t think swapping a AA catcher for a major league, starting centerfielder with Gold Glove defensive ability sounds like too lopsided a deal. The point is, we have an extra centerfielder. They have an extra catcher. They need a centerfielder. We could use a good young catcher. Of course, this is probably all speculation anyway and Theo will trade Coco for, like, Wily Mo Gagne.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]