As recently as yesterday morning, it was assumed that free-agent catcher Yorvit Torrealba would be a New York Met in 2008. It was reported that the two sides had reached a three-year $14.4 million agreement and all that was left was a routine physical.

But something happened.

By Saturday afternoon, reports trickled out. The deal was dead, and talks had ceased altogether, making a post I had been drafting in preparation for the signing (entitled “Oh God, No”) uttlerly useless.

Here’s the thing. There was speculation that if Jorge Posada were to test free agency, that the Mets were going after him with a vengeance. Not because signing him away from the Yankees would make backpage headlines, but because they hoenstly thought that he was clearly the best option:

Free Agent Catchers* in 2007-08 – At least the ones you’ve heard of…

(with Age and Career OPS) 

Paul Bako (35, .621)

Rod Barajas (32, .696)

Michael Barrett (31, .747)

Sal Fasano (36, .687… Stache.)

Jason Kendall (33, .768)

Jason LaRue (33, .723)

Mike Lieberthal (35, .783)

Paul Lo Duca (35, .752)

Damian Miller (38, .740)

Doug Mirabelli (37, .724)

Jose Molina (32, .624)

Yorvit Torreabla (29, .705)

*Mike Piazza is no longer a catcher. Get over it, Mets fans. He ain’t comin’ back.

As you can see for yourself, it’s just not an inspiring bunch. Catchers notoriously hit a wall once they hit 32-33 years old. 99.9% of them do not have their career seasons at 36 years old like Posada did. Simply put, it’s a terrible year to be looking for a catcher. The available ones are either has-beens or never-wills. Which is why the Mets had offered a contract to Torrealba. He was the only one under 30  who had a prayer of posting a .700+ OPS in 2008. The market is just that bad. And it’s not going to improve next year either, when the top names (if they remain unsigned) will be Jason Varitek, Pudge Rodriguez, and Kenji Johjima, who will all be a year older, obviously.

Obtaining a good catcher via free agency is very difficult. Let’s say that a catcher is drafted by an MLB team at the age of 20. This team does not have to add this player to the 40-man roster for three years. If they make it this far, then there’s six more years until he becomes eligible for free agency. A 29 year-old catcher does not have the same body as a 29 year-old outfielder. Moreover, teams know this and lock up their franchise backstops to reasonable long-term deals before they regret losing them. So what you generally end up with is a list of guys who are on the wrong side of 30 or wasn’t good enough to merit a long contract.

In 2007, there were 8 catchers with 400 plate appearances who OPSed over .750. Out of this lot, only Josh Bard made his MLB-debut with a different team than his current employers. Perhaps moreso than any other position, homegrown talent is by far the best way to go to find yourself a quality catcher, it seems. Only problem is, the Mets never really have produced a quality catcher in their franchise’s 44-year history (apologies to Todd Hundley).

But without such an option, where do the Mets turn now? As I write this, there appear to be three options:

  1. Trade for Ramon Hernandez – Two years ago, the Mets simultaneously offered contracts to both Hernandez and Bengie Molina but neither ended up at Shea. But with the Orioles facing yet another off-season that’s lacking direction (are you rebuilding or trying to win now?), there’s speculation that Hernandez is available. But the Orioles are reportedly asking for a top-flight prospect.
  2. Trade for Gerald Laird – With the arrival of Jarrod Saltalamacchia in Arlington, Laird’s name has appeared in trade rumors. He’s only 28 years old and he will certainly not cost as much as Hernandez to acquire. But there are two problems here – Saltalamacchia’s near future may be at first base, which doesn’t make Laird redundant, and even at 28, he’s only had 881 big league at-bats, during which he’s posted a sub-.300 OBP.
  3. Start Ramon Castro – One signing that didn’t make much waves is the news that the Mets are keeping Castro around for the next two years. The man (whose head is absolutely gigantic…) who homered in over 7.5% of his ABs in 2007 is currently the only viable option the Mets possess. He slugged .556 in 144 ABs this past year, but not even the most optimistic of Mets fans expect this to continue into 2008.

To me, the best option appears to be the third at this stage of the game. Hernandez is a 31 year-old coming off an injury-plagued year. Laird has never shown that he’s worth giving up anything to acquire him. So why not give Castro a shot? At least until something better comes along, of course…

4 Responses to “Mets-Torrealba Deal Collapses: Catchers Market Still Terrible”

  1. bc twins fan says:

    Santana and Redmond for Wright and Milliage (sp?)

  2. I love Johan Santana (who doesn’t?). But the Mets cannot and will not part with their franchise player who’s signed to a reasonable long-term deal for a pitcher (no matter how talented he is) who may walk after next season. Even if they can resign Santana, when weighing their respective values based on their costs, any team, I think, would prefer to have Wright over Santana. Throw in Milledge, who still projects as an above-average OFer, and it’s not even a contest.

  3. Coley Ward says:

    Looks like the Mets have found their catcher. According to Metsblog, today New York traded Guillerma Mota for Johnny Estrada.

    “In 120 games with the Brewers last season, Estrada hit .278 with 10 homers and 54 RBI.

    Estrada underwent arthroscopic surgery on October 4th to repair torn medical meniscus in his left knee. He also had a bone spur removed from his right elbow.”

    Estrada has now worn out his welcome in Arizona and Milwaukee. He must be a real gem.

    This was the Mets trading their steroid user for the Brewers’ malcontent.

  4. I expect very little from Estrada. But I don’t expect much at all from the catcher’s position all together. The only impact guy was Posada and he never became a free agent. If that’s the case, then a one-year rental of Estrada for useless Guillermo Mota is OK by me. Estrada won’t get any better, but I’d rather him for a year than any of the other available guys for three.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]