Roid rage?Every December and every July for the past few seasons, Miguel Tejada has been a standby of the trade rumor mill. No longer. The Orioles, looking to start afresh, are shopping all their big-name players this winter and today, they traded Tejada to the Astros for five younguns: Luke Scott, Matt Albers, Troy Patton, Dennis Sarfate, and Mike Constanzo. The reaction at UmpBump was swift and scathing:

Nick to UmpBump Staff – 1:52 pm

Re: Tejada to the Astros

Is there anything more fun than watching Ed Wade run the Astros into the ground?

Paul to UmpBump Staff – 2:01 pm

Re: re: Tejada to the Astros

Yes. Watching Ed Wade run the Phillies into the ground. I miss those days.

Other blogs concur. “That’s a fine haul for Baltimore,” notes MLB Trade Rumors. “The Astros pretty much cleaned out their farm system for two years of an average-hitting third baseman.” Bugs and Cranks takes a quick look at the kiddies’ numbers and concludes that “the Houston Five are a couple lefthanded bats with some pop – particularly Scott, who had 18 homers last year – and three pitchers with varying degrees of promise.” Over at the Fanhouse, the consensus is the same: “For a team that’s short on young players, the Astros dealt a lot of them for two years of Tejada. Everyone knew that the Orioles were desperate to move Tejada’s salary. To get so much in return for a player coming off a down year is a feather in the cap of Andy MacPhail.”

But in Baltimore, the reaction has been very different. On the Baltimore Sun’s blog, Bill Ordine laments:

The Orioles sent Miguel Tejada to Houston, and for all those who thought the four-time All Star shortstop would be tasty trade bait, well, think again.

There are five guys coming here — outfielder Luke Scott, pitchers Matt Albers, Troy Patton and Dennis Sarfate and third baseman Michael Costanzo.

If there’s a household name in there, it’s Luke Scott. And if it is a household name for you, you must live in Scott’s neighborhood.

The deal must have been a hard one for O’s fans who, just a few years ago, were being offered Manny Ramirez and Matt Clement for their four-time All-Star shortstop. And some of these players aren’t exactly hot young prospects with tons of upside—Scott is 29.

But—and now it starts to get interesting—some of those who think Baltimore’s haul for Tejada is suspiciously slim think the Orioles were desperate to unload a player who is sure to be named in the Mitchell report tomorrow. Tejada was linked to Rafael Palmeiro’s steroid probe two years ago, and the blogosphere is rife with conspiracies about Baltimore dumping him today before his name became as poisoned as Barry Bonds’, who is currently out of work and under indictment. FanNation notes that Pettitte also signed his contract today—and has also been mentioned as a possible Mitchell reportee. And for its part, the Associated Press tried to ask about the timing of the deal vis-a-vis the Mitchell investigation, and got stonewalled.

So what do you say UmpBumpers? Who got the better of this deal? The Astros, who get Miguel Tejada for a bunch of guys who aren’t that good anyway? Or the Orioles, who get a cadre of new young(ish) players, divest themselves of Tejada’s salary, and manage to pull it all off just before what little value he has retained takes a nosedive?

5 Responses to “O’s fans suspect Tejada deal linked to Mitchell report”

  1. Funny clothes on cafepress: bonds funny/-/pv_design_details/pg_1/id_21480405/opt_/fpt_/c_666/

  2. Coley Ward says:

    Well, according to Vegas Watch, Luke Scott might be a better player right now than Tejada is. So I’d have to say the Orioles got the best of this deal.

  3. Sarah Green says:

    Coley, I’d expect you to be curious as to why Ed Wade was willing to trade so much for a guy who is likely to be named as a steroid user tomorrow afternoon. Or have you just given up on ever understanding the inner workings of Ed Wade’s “brain”?

  4. I don’t think this is a good deal for the Astros but I refuse to believe Andy Mac-F-A-I-L got the better of anyone.

  5. Here’s how I see it (and there’s a good chance I have no idea what I’m talking about):

    First off, if I was an Orioles fan, I would actually hope that this is the start of a fire sale. Trade away Ramon Hernandez to anyone who wants him. Trade away Brian Roberts for some prospects. See if Corey Patterson still has any value. Give Erik Bedard a $100m deal. Give Nick Markakis a long-term extension (say, 4 years, $35 million). Build around those guys plus Guthrie and Loewen. They’re probably stuck with the Mora, Bradford, Huff and Gibbons deals though. Those are terrible contracts. Basically, I like this deal for Baltimore for one reason – it’s SOMETHING. This is a team that spent $93m in 2007 and couldn’t win 70 games. Even if they spent $20m more this off-season, it still wouldn’t have made them contenders in the AL East. At least this is a direction instead of continued mediocrity.

    For the Astros, I think they completely overvalued their own chances to win. They’re in a terrible situation – their stars are getting older, their farm system is nonexistent and there’s no quality free agents. Both Lee and Berkman are going to be 32 in 2008. I don’t know about you guys, but looking at their bodies, I don’t expect them to age very well. Wade thought that he has a two-year window to win. Problem is, he just cleared out their farm system for a big offensive upgrade AND a big defensive downgrade. Sure, Tejada will hit a lot better than Adam Everett. But Everett is so much better than Tejada with the glove. I wouldn’t call it a “wash” since Tejada’s bat still makes him more valuable, but it’s not a huge positive impact. The Astros won 73 games last year. Even in the NL Central, they finished 12 games out. Mind you, the Astros were relatively healthy too. Their two big bats (Lee and Berkman) and their undisputed ace all performed about as well as you can rationally expect. At this point, Wade seems to be banking on the fact that a healthy Hunter Pence plus the addition of Tejada will be enough to make up those 12 games. Ain’t gonna happen. No way, no how.

    By the way, if this Mitchell report influencing the O’s thing has merit, wouldn’t they just pay someone to take Jay Gibbons?

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]