<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UmpBump&#8217;s Week 17 Fantasy Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/</link>
	<description>In-your-face baseball commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:44:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Miller</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-56360</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-56360</guid>
		<description>Big wins in 5 out of the last six weeks has put me in fourth place. I have the Box89 team this week, and then finish the year having to run the gauntlet by facing ElDuque, Center Field, Crunkball, and Somerville. If I can survive I will be feeling pretty good about my chances in the playoffs, if not, well, let&#039;s not think about that.

As it is, I feel pretty good about my chances to finish strong because I have Papi back. Top to bottom I have a pretty darn good lineup. Doumit, Howard, Cano, Hardy, Headley, Ortiz, Votto, Granderson, Griffey, Berkman, and Zimmerman. Weak in stolen bases, but strong in every other area.

My pitching features some strong starters who all have good K/BB ratios, although my boy Jonathan Sanchez may have to go once Chris Carpenter comes back. Jenks and Soria are my only current closers, so that may be a weakness; however Morrow, Grabow and Balfour may get some saves if the fantasy gods will allow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big wins in 5 out of the last six weeks has put me in fourth place. I have the Box89 team this week, and then finish the year having to run the gauntlet by facing ElDuque, Center Field, Crunkball, and Somerville. If I can survive I will be feeling pretty good about my chances in the playoffs, if not, well, let&#8217;s not think about that.</p>
<p>As it is, I feel pretty good about my chances to finish strong because I have Papi back. Top to bottom I have a pretty darn good lineup. Doumit, Howard, Cano, Hardy, Headley, Ortiz, Votto, Granderson, Griffey, Berkman, and Zimmerman. Weak in stolen bases, but strong in every other area.</p>
<p>My pitching features some strong starters who all have good K/BB ratios, although my boy Jonathan Sanchez may have to go once Chris Carpenter comes back. Jenks and Soria are my only current closers, so that may be a weakness; however Morrow, Grabow and Balfour may get some saves if the fantasy gods will allow.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_56360"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 56360 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_56360"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Green</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50094</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50094</guid>
		<description>And yes, I&#039;m sure my parents are also proud of what that expensive education accomplished.

&quot;After years of the finest New England private schooling, our daughter makes up marginally vulgar new words for baseball pitches! That have already been invented!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, I&#8217;m sure my parents are also proud of what that expensive education accomplished.</p>
<p>&#8220;After years of the finest New England private schooling, our daughter makes up marginally vulgar new words for baseball pitches! That have already been invented!&#8221;
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50094"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50094 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50094"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Green</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50093</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50093</guid>
		<description>Goddammit. And I was so proud of my wordsmithery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goddammit. And I was so proud of my wordsmithery.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50093"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50093 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50093"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One More Dying Quail</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50092</link>
		<dc:creator>One More Dying Quail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50092</guid>
		<description>Sarah,

Papelbon beat you to it:

http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/08/22/new_pitch_same_story_for_papelbon/

How proud my mother would be right now if she knew that I had taken part in an intelligent discussion on baseball...and that my &quot;part&quot; was to provide the origins of the word &quot;slutter&quot;.  It&#039;s like all the hopes and dreams she had for me when I was a child are finally coming true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah,</p>
<p>Papelbon beat you to it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/08/22/new_pitch_same_story_for_papelbon/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/08/22/new_pitch_same_story_for_papelbon/</a></p>
<p>How proud my mother would be right now if she knew that I had taken part in an intelligent discussion on baseball&#8230;and that my &#8220;part&#8221; was to provide the origins of the word &#8220;slutter&#8221;.  It&#8217;s like all the hopes and dreams she had for me when I was a child are finally coming true.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50092"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50092 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50092"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Green</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50083</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50083</guid>
		<description>Also, I think we should name Papelbon&#039;s &quot;slider/cutter&quot; a &quot;slutter.&quot; That would amuse me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I think we should name Papelbon&#8217;s &#8220;slider/cutter&#8221; a &#8220;slutter.&#8221; That would amuse me.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50083"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50083 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50083"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Green</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50082</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50082</guid>
		<description>Lyndsay, I agree about Okajima! I am glad that Jerry Remy apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://umpbump.com/press/the-okajima-deception/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reads UmpBump&lt;/a&gt; too.

About Paps, I think your eyes may be deceiving you a little bit. Yes, his ERA is an uncharacteristically &quot;high&quot; 2.00, higher than it&#039;s ever been as a reliever. But that could partly be UmpBump&#039;s favorite stat, BABIP, striking again. Papelbon&#039;s has been .313 this year--a little high, but not super-crazy high. Otherwise, only a few things stand out to me, statistically. 

His K/9 rate is still up where it usually lives---an excellent 11.33---but his K/BB rate is ALSO 11.33, which is fantastic, but crazy high! (His K/BB the past two years has been 5.77 and 5.60, so we can see that his walk rate so far this year is waaaay down.) He also usually gives up more fly balls than ground balls, but this year he&#039;s given up more grounders. His BAA this year is .220, when it&#039;s been way below .200 the past two years. Are hitters just being more aggressive against him? Most of the hits he&#039;s given up have been early in the count. Maybe the hitters are going in there, like, &quot;I&#039;m just going to go up there and swing, and God willing, I&#039;ll get a hit.&quot; 

Or maybe these extra hits are coming off of that new &quot;slider/cutter&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2007/10/papelbon_on_let.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;he revealed last year on Letterman&lt;/a&gt;. Though I am not a PITCHf/x expert.

Any other ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyndsay, I agree about Okajima! I am glad that Jerry Remy apparently <a href="http://umpbump.com/press/the-okajima-deception/" rel="nofollow">reads UmpBump</a> too.</p>
<p>About Paps, I think your eyes may be deceiving you a little bit. Yes, his ERA is an uncharacteristically &#8220;high&#8221; 2.00, higher than it&#8217;s ever been as a reliever. But that could partly be UmpBump&#8217;s favorite stat, BABIP, striking again. Papelbon&#8217;s has been .313 this year&#8211;a little high, but not super-crazy high. Otherwise, only a few things stand out to me, statistically. </p>
<p>His K/9 rate is still up where it usually lives&#8212;an excellent 11.33&#8212;but his K/BB rate is ALSO 11.33, which is fantastic, but crazy high! (His K/BB the past two years has been 5.77 and 5.60, so we can see that his walk rate so far this year is waaaay down.) He also usually gives up more fly balls than ground balls, but this year he&#8217;s given up more grounders. His BAA this year is .220, when it&#8217;s been way below .200 the past two years. Are hitters just being more aggressive against him? Most of the hits he&#8217;s given up have been early in the count. Maybe the hitters are going in there, like, &#8220;I&#8217;m just going to go up there and swing, and God willing, I&#8217;ll get a hit.&#8221; </p>
<p>Or maybe these extra hits are coming off of that new &#8220;slider/cutter&#8221; <a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2007/10/papelbon_on_let.html" rel="nofollow">he revealed last year on Letterman</a>. Though I am not a PITCHf/x expert.</p>
<p>Any other ideas?
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50082"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50082 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50082"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndsay</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50078</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50078</guid>
		<description>Remy was noting last night (and I concur) that Okajima comes in a lot to get out of bases-jammed situations. maybe they need to start him fresh in an inning to get his confidence back, because those situations seem to be what kills him.

I still think something&#039;s off with Papelbon this season (and no it&#039;s not his general personality). to me, he&#039;s not as sharp as last year.

I don&#039;t know what to think about Hansen right now. I am just glad he cut his mullet off and got a grownup hairdo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remy was noting last night (and I concur) that Okajima comes in a lot to get out of bases-jammed situations. maybe they need to start him fresh in an inning to get his confidence back, because those situations seem to be what kills him.</p>
<p>I still think something&#8217;s off with Papelbon this season (and no it&#8217;s not his general personality). to me, he&#8217;s not as sharp as last year.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to think about Hansen right now. I am just glad he cut his mullet off and got a grownup hairdo.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50078"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50078 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50078"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Green</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50070</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50070</guid>
		<description>Nick, the Red Sox bullpen has been slightly weaker than the starting rotation across the board, which is why I focused on them. The Red Sox have plenty of starting depth, and guys like Beckett and Daisuke and even youngster Buchholz have all shown that they can pitch better than they have so far and it seems reasonable to expect some improvement as the season wears on. Lester is more of a work in progress, as Lyndsay noted. Wakefield, the knuckleballer, is the only one who has the right to issue so many walks. With the Buck in the minors right now to &quot;work on his fastball command,&quot; and Sir Daisuke Walksalot on the DL to rest, I think they&#039;ll be able to turn around the starters with relative ease.

When you consider that Boston starters have pitched more innings than Boston relievers, I&#039;m not surprised at all that the starters have issued more total walks. But the relievers and the starters have issued walks at almost exactly the same rate---0.427 per inning for the starters, .0424 for the relievers.


So I focused on the bullpen because to me, fixing the bullpen is going to be more problematic. First, consider that when a starter walks a few too many guys, he&#039;s gotten himself into a jam. A jam that a reliever will likely be called into fix. If the reliever also walks guys, what do you have? Runs. Runs are bad. 

Second, the bullpen just doesn&#039;t have the depth that the starting rotation has. The Red Sox are relying a lot on young guys (Hansen and Delcarmen) who don&#039;t have that flinty, steely, I-WANT-TO-EAT-YOUR-CHILDREN look in their eyes when they come into a game. We joke about intangibles, but I think for relievers who enter the game in high-leverage moments, it&#039;s good to have a bit of that attitude. (See file: Papelbon.) Maybe they&#039;ll gain some confidence with more experience---Delcarmen did strike out the side for the first time this year just last night, which cheered me greatly. When you throw high-90s heat, you don&#039;t need to nibble.

As for Aardsma, it&#039;s all relative. I praised him because every time he goes out there, I expect him to let in a run. Yet he hasn&#039;t been that bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, the Red Sox bullpen has been slightly weaker than the starting rotation across the board, which is why I focused on them. The Red Sox have plenty of starting depth, and guys like Beckett and Daisuke and even youngster Buchholz have all shown that they can pitch better than they have so far and it seems reasonable to expect some improvement as the season wears on. Lester is more of a work in progress, as Lyndsay noted. Wakefield, the knuckleballer, is the only one who has the right to issue so many walks. With the Buck in the minors right now to &#8220;work on his fastball command,&#8221; and Sir Daisuke Walksalot on the DL to rest, I think they&#8217;ll be able to turn around the starters with relative ease.</p>
<p>When you consider that Boston starters have pitched more innings than Boston relievers, I&#8217;m not surprised at all that the starters have issued more total walks. But the relievers and the starters have issued walks at almost exactly the same rate&#8212;0.427 per inning for the starters, .0424 for the relievers.</p>
<p>So I focused on the bullpen because to me, fixing the bullpen is going to be more problematic. First, consider that when a starter walks a few too many guys, he&#8217;s gotten himself into a jam. A jam that a reliever will likely be called into fix. If the reliever also walks guys, what do you have? Runs. Runs are bad. </p>
<p>Second, the bullpen just doesn&#8217;t have the depth that the starting rotation has. The Red Sox are relying a lot on young guys (Hansen and Delcarmen) who don&#8217;t have that flinty, steely, I-WANT-TO-EAT-YOUR-CHILDREN look in their eyes when they come into a game. We joke about intangibles, but I think for relievers who enter the game in high-leverage moments, it&#8217;s good to have a bit of that attitude. (See file: Papelbon.) Maybe they&#8217;ll gain some confidence with more experience&#8212;Delcarmen did strike out the side for the first time this year just last night, which cheered me greatly. When you throw high-90s heat, you don&#8217;t need to nibble.</p>
<p>As for Aardsma, it&#8217;s all relative. I praised him because every time he goes out there, I expect him to let in a run. Yet he hasn&#8217;t been that bad.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50070"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50070 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50070"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndsay</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50065</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50065</guid>
		<description>Buck can be forgiven - he&#039;s a kid and he&#039;s going to spend some time in the minors to work on his stuff (unfortunately for Dennis Eckersley :-() Beckett has been unlucky in a couple of his starts in that a couple of them were games he SHOULD have won, but didn&#039;t get any run support. so I think in Beckett&#039;s case, his record isn&#039;t really accurately reflective of his performance. on the flip side, Dice-K&#039;s record is not reflective of his performance at all - there were games in there that he definitely SHOULD have lost. 

Lester is the one that throws me - I&#039;m usually like, &quot;oh, fuck him and his cancer! he can&#039;t get past 5 innings without giving up 4 runs!&quot;...and then he goes and throws a no-hitter. and then it&#039;s back to 4 runs in 5 innings the next week (or something like that). his inconsistency is maddening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buck can be forgiven &#8211; he&#8217;s a kid and he&#8217;s going to spend some time in the minors to work on his stuff (unfortunately for Dennis Eckersley :-() Beckett has been unlucky in a couple of his starts in that a couple of them were games he SHOULD have won, but didn&#8217;t get any run support. so I think in Beckett&#8217;s case, his record isn&#8217;t really accurately reflective of his performance. on the flip side, Dice-K&#8217;s record is not reflective of his performance at all &#8211; there were games in there that he definitely SHOULD have lost. </p>
<p>Lester is the one that throws me &#8211; I&#8217;m usually like, &#8220;oh, fuck him and his cancer! he can&#8217;t get past 5 innings without giving up 4 runs!&#8221;&#8230;and then he goes and throws a no-hitter. and then it&#8217;s back to 4 runs in 5 innings the next week (or something like that). his inconsistency is maddening.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50065"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50065 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50065"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kapur</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2008/07/28/umpbumps-week-17-fantasy-results/comment-page-1/#comment-50062</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=2489#comment-50062</guid>
		<description>Coley I did look it up and you are right - Dice-K is the worst culprit with walks (5.3 BB/9).  But he also strikes out a lot of guys and has been lucky with BABIP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coley I did look it up and you are right &#8211; Dice-K is the worst culprit with walks (5.3 BB/9).  But he also strikes out a lot of guys and has been lucky with BABIP.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_50062"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 50062 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_50062"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
