• Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor l...

Yesterday was the first day that those eligible for free agency this off season were able to file, and among the 65 players who did so was Oliver Perez. MetsBlog.com writes that Ollie will initially seek upwards of $50MM over five years, “while eventually settling on a three– or four-year deal later in the off-season”.

Perez has now logged just a shade under 1000 innings in his major league career that began in 2002 with the Padres. He rose to fame in 2004 as the 22-year old future lefty ace of the Pittsburgh Pirates, going 12-10, posting an ERA of 2.98 with 239 Ks over 196 innings. Four full seasons later, we’re still yet to see another year quite like that out of him. The popular opinion of Perez seems to be that he’s an erratic, yet at times dominant young pitcher with loads of potential that just hasn’t been tapped.

Over the past two plus years since he became a Met, I’ve cheered for Ollie. And quite frankly, I’m hoping that I won’t have to ever again. Why? Because he’s not good. He’s not good enough to warrant his reputation, and he’s certainly not good enough to receive such a large contract – even at three or four years.

It appears that there’s still a lot of people out there who think that Perez will be able to duplicate his 2004 season once again with the proper instruction. And it’s never going to happen. We have four full seasons worth of information to work with here that shows why.

For one, in that 2004 season, Ollie struck out an incredible 11.5 batters per nine innings. That’s impressive for a closer. For a starter who logged close to 200 innings, that’s incredible. But he followed that up with disastrous 2005 and 2006 as a Pirate, seeing his strikeouts per nine plummet to 7.9 and 6.5 respectively. And although he’s gotten those numbers back into “good” territory since he was traded in July of 2006 to New York, it’s still quite a ways away from 11.5. On top of that, Perez’ walks per nine innings haven’t been better than it was in ’04 either, peaking (in a bad way) in 2005 with 5.7 free passes per game.

But that’s not all. The Hardball Times keeps a stat called FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching). In the simplest terms, FIP is what that particular pitcher’s ERA would be if the defense behind him was the same as that for every other pitcher. Taking it a step further, Hardball also uses something called xFIP (Expected Fielding Independent Pitching), which calculates what the FIP of each pitcher would be if his HR-allowed were more in line with his flyball rates (It’s generally believed that if a significant percentage of the flyballs given up by the pitcher are going over the fence, it’s either due to a small ballpark or just plain bad luck). For those of you who believe that this stuff is just fancy mumbo-jumbo, just know that it’s a very useful tool to be able to predict the future ERA of pitchers.

Anyhow, if you look at these stats for Oliver Perez (chart on right), you’ll notice something. Since 2005, Perez’ ERA has ranged widely from a low of 3.56 to a high of 6.63. What about FIP? It’s a much smaller range, from 4.36 to 6.19. And it’s even tighter for xFIP – 4.65 to 6.10.

So what does this tell us? For one, Oliver Perez is a below average starter whose ERA should be in the high-4s or even low 5s. And he’s not really that inconsistent on a year to year basis. Aside from that 2006 tenure with the Pirates (which lasted for 15 games), there are no real outliers. His xFIP has been predictable. What has varied is his level of luck and the quality of the defense that’s been behind him. Put an average defensive team behind Oliver Perez and all those guys he’s walking are going to score.

Sure, whereever Ollie ends up, he’ll probably still rack up the strikeouts. But he’ll also keep walking 4+ guys per game. And while he’s been able to keep his actual ERA well below the FIP and xFIP over the past two seasons, it’s a decent bet that this can’t continue. Yes, he’s still young as he won’t turn 27 until June. But we’ve seen him for almost 1000 innings now and he hasn’t changed.

Now do you want to spend $10MM a year on this guy?

9 Responses to “Buyer Beware: Oliver Perez”

  1. Coley Ward says:

    I guess it’s all about context. Do I think it’s crazy to spend $10 million a year on Perez? Absolutely. But it doesn’t seem so crazy when there are teams willing to spend $12 million a year on Carlos Silva.

  2. I think Minaya needs to accomplish a LOT this off-season. I’d be saying that anyway but even more so given his contract extension. I like the fact that Jerry is still the manager but changes need to be made – a third collapse will not be tolerated by anyone!!!

    I believe Carlos Delgado has just exercised his option on the FA. Is it me, or does anyone else like the idea of going after Texiera as a replacement for Delgado? The Mets certainly have the money and as Delgado is not getting any younger, it makes sense to me.

    Obviosuly pitching needs to be addressed as does the closer role although I did read rumours concerning Brian Fuentes and J.J. Putz earlier in the week

  3. Who among Lowe, Burnett and Vasquez according to FIP and xFIP should Teams Pursue?

  4. 10 million isn’t bad for him, he’s easily worth at least 7 million in the current market, and let’s not forget he is left handed, which makes him a bigger commodity than a right hander with similar stats.

    2008 Salaries
    Andy Pettitte: 16 million
    Randy Johnson: 15.1 million
    Kenny Rogers: 8 million
    Tom Glavine: 8 million

    So 10 million is just fine for Perez since he is also only 26 years old, as you mention. A 4-5 year contract takes him right through his prime years. When you consider Atlanta threw 8 million at Glavine who was clearly inferior to Perez in 2007 and 15 years older, 10 million on a multi-year deal is kinda a no-brainer. It ain’t like throwing 135 million at Mike Hampton.

  5. I don’t believe that the market rate dictates actual value. The market rate is bloated. Just because someone overspends on one pitcher, doesn’t mean that you should too. I’m not saying that someone won’t dish out $40M over 4 to get Perez. I’m saying that whoever does will regret it.

    And there’s an astronomical difference between giving a pitcher a 1 year $8M deal (Glavine) and another a 4 year $40M deal. There’s no comparison. A one year deal limits damage considerably.

  6. And hojo, to answer your question, it’s Lowe, then Burnett, then Vazquez – at least in 2008. Out of those three,I’ll take Lowe for the next three years, which is kind of odd since he’s the oldest out of the three. But he’s a sinkerball pitcher and they generally hold up better with age. Burnett is always an injury risk and Vazquez always underperforms his peripherals.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.
    • David the okajima: was wondering if I related too this guy?
    • HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian.
    • handsomerandyblackladdiebrad1953: Plus,Jackson’s Polo Grounds-heightened batting stats,when park-adjusted,make...

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]