• Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor l...

I’ve been trying to decide what the Mets need. I mean, in 2007 they were all but a lock for the playoffs before embarking on an epic fail of historic proportions. Then they went out and acquired the best pitcher on the market. So theoretically, they should’ve come back this year and been even better than they were in 2007 — given the pitching weakness of the Braves (despite their status as an official March 2008 “Trendy Pick”) and the age of the Phillies (the oldest team in MLB — thanks, Jamie Moyer!), surely it was reasonable to expect the Mets to spend much of 2008 in first place in the NL East, if not to run away with the division title.

But they didn’t. Why? What happened? How could this be? They were second in the NL in runs scored, fourth in OPS, second in steals, and first in intentional walks (despite being seventh in home runs). A solid offense, in other words.

Their defense, too, was well above-average, as was their starting pitching — the area that New York focused so diligently on last winter. As starters, the Mets were second in the NL in BAA, fifth in ERA, third in IP, fourth in K’s. Unfortunately, they were also second in walks — but aside from that, their starters performed well.

What could POSSIBLY account for their failure to make the playoffs?

Ah.

Aha.

The bullpen.

Alas, poor bullpen! Words like “shocking,” “awful,” and “sadistic” were used to describe the Mets bullpen this year. We saw headlines like: “METS BULLPEN BLOWS ANOTHER LEAD,” “HOW BAD IS THE METS BULLPEN?” and “METS BULLPEN CAUSES INTERNAL BLEEDING, RENAL FAILURE, LOSS OF BOWEL CONTROL.” The Mets bullpen was so bad, they currently have an approval rating lower than George Bush’s. The Mets bullpen was so bad, George Thorogood and the Destroyers wrote a song about it. The Mets bullpen was so bad, they actually caused a 9% drop in the Dow. (I will turn actual analysis here over to Jay Jaffe, who had a great breakdown on Baseball Prospectus — don’t worry, it’s free.) Hence, building a bullpen is New York’s major task this offseason.

A bullpen should lower the team’s ERA, not raise it. But as good as New York’s starters were, their relievers last year were terrible, posting a 4.25 ERA–13th out of 16 teams. They were 12th in K’s, and a K is a useful thing when you’re often coming into the game with runners on. In other areas, like K/BB and WHIP, the Mets were just average, or a even below average.

But can a weak bullpen — even a terrible, sadistic, organ-liquifyingly bad bullpen — really be a great team’s undoing?

Keep in mind that the Mets only finished 3 games out of first, and that they had the third-best run differential in the league. In fact, the Mets teams of the past few years remind me of the Red Sox teams I grew accustomed to seeing around the turn of the millennium — excellent teams who played in a tough division and just managed to fall short. So, yes. The bullpen here could be — and was — the difference.

But now, there are plenty of closers available, and it seems like the Mets are checking up on just about all of them, as well as the set-up men, middle-men, mop-up men, and just about every other relief arm available. Beyond that, they’re also making a run at the same decent, mid-rotation pitchers everyone else is in the mix on. Nothing bold or terribly exciting, but the extreme pitching focus makes sense for the Mets. The Mets have already invested heavily in what is still, epic fails aside, an extremely good team. This is the perfect time for an aggressive, win-now strategy.

So, in sum:

1) Cast a wide net and pick up as much pitching quality and quantity as you can get.

2) Keep your fingers crossed that the Braves really have given up on Jake Peavy (though that sounds like it’s just a bargaining tactic, to me).

3) Move to new stadium, leave old demons behind.

And none of that works, try a Cole Hamels voodoo doll bobblehead giveaway.

- What They Need index-

4 Responses to “What They Need: New York Mets — Some Sort of Exorcism? Okay, or Pitching.”

  1. Here is what I would like to see happen…sign SP Ben Sheets and Closer K-Rod, and replace the whole bullpen but Joe Smith!

  2. Coley Ward says:

    As a Phillies fan I’d like nothing more than to see the Mets sign Sheets and K-Rod. There’s nothing like seeing the competition replace one injury-prone pitcher (Pedro) with another, and one aging closer (Wagner) with a declining one.

  3. Let me guess, Santana is declining as well right? Because that’s what everyone was saying last off-season! Yet if the bullpen held onto half of his wins he would have another Cy Young on his shelf for this season. K-Rod is not declining at 27yrs old!!!

    And here is Ben Sheets injury history:

    * 2003 – bulging discs in his lower back, but these problems subsided in 2004.NO DL
    * 2005 – a series of inner ear infections – trip to the DL
    * 2006 – started season on the DL with with shoulder tendinitis.
    * 2007 – strained hamstring- DL trip in late August forced him to miss the rest of the regular season

    I would not call that injury prone!

  4. Doug, if you took a step back, I think you’ll agree that the point of decline is different for every individual. Regardless of his age, it’s clear that K-Rod’s fastball is down to 92-94. Which wouldn’t be such a big deal if his slider was still great but it’s not. He’s another guy whose reputation exceeds his actual skill. The typical age of decline is just a rule of thumb. Guys with such forceful motions like K-Rod are their own species.

    Regarding Sheets, his history is worse than you suggest. He’s made 30 starts only once in the last four years. From 2005-2007, he made 22, 17, and 24. In his walk year, he starts 31. You can absolutely disagree with this assessment, but out of those four numbers, I’d be more skeptical of that 31 than the others. For a short incentive laden deal, Sheets would be a great value. But in a market where guys with his talents are getting 5-years at $15MM plus per year, it’s a huge gamble that’s probably not going to pay off. When healthy, he’s one of the best. And I have no idea if he really is or will be.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.
    • David the okajima: was wondering if I related too this guy?
    • HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian.
    • handsomerandyblackladdiebrad1953: Plus,Jackson’s Polo Grounds-heightened batting stats,when park-adjusted,make...

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]