33 Responses to “Open Thread: The Sabathia Deal”
Leave a Comment
By submitting your comment, you acknowledge that you've read and agree to our comment policy.
What we're reading...
Subscribe to our feed
Archives
Full list of archives
Baseball Stuff
- Babes Love Baseball
- Baseball Analysts
- Baseball Musings
- Baseball Prospectus Unfiltered
- Baseball Reference
- Baseball Reflections
- Baseball Think Factory
- Beyond the Box Score
- Big League Stew
- Bugs and Cranks
- Bus League Baseball
- Fangraphs
- Home Run Derby
- Minor League Ball
- MLB Trade Rumors
- More Hardball
- Razzball
- Sabernomics
- ShysterBall
- Squawking Baseball
- The Biz of Baseball
- The Dugout
- The FanHouse
- Walkoff Walk
- Yanksfan vs Soxfan
Blogs of the AL
- [A's] Athletics Nation
- [Angels] Halos Heaven
- [Blue Jays] Bluebird Banter
- [Blue Jays] Drunk Jays Fans
- [Indians] Let’s Go Tribe
- [Indians] The DiaTribe
- [Mariners] Lookout Landing
- [Mariners] U.S.S. Mariner
- [Orioles] Camden Chat
- [Orioles] The Loss Column
- [Rangers] Lone Star Ball
- [Rays] DRays Bay
- [Rays] Rays Index
- [Red Sox] Boston Dirt Dogs
- [Red Sox] Call of the Green Monster
- [Red Sox] Center Field
- [Red Sox] Fire Brand of the American League
- [Red Sox] Over the Monster
- [Red Sox] Sox and Dawgs
- [Red Sox] Surviving Grady
- [Red Sox] The Joy of Sox
- [Red Sox] The Soxaholix
- [Royals] In Dayton We Trust
- [Royals] Royals Review
- [Tigers] Bless You Boys
- [Twins] Aaron Gleeman
- [Twins] Twinkie Town
- [Twins] Twins Territory
- [White Sox] South Side Sox
- [White Sox] Sox Machine
- [Yankees] My Baseball Bias
- [Yankees] Pinstripe Alley
- [Yankees] River Ave. Blues
- [Yankees] Zell’s Pinstripe Blog
Blogs of the NL
- [Astros] The Crawfish Boxes
- [Braves] Talking Chop
- [Brewers] Brew Crew Ball
- [Cardinals] Viva El Birdos
- [Cubs] Bleed Cubbie Blue
- [Cubs] Wrigleyville23
- [Diamondbacks] AZ Snakepit
- [Diamondbacks] DBacks Buzz
- [Dodgers] Dodger Blues
- [Dodgers] Dodger Thoughts
- [Dodgers] Memories of Kevin Malone
- [Dodgers] Mike Scioscia’s Tragic Illness
- [Dodgers] True Blue LA
- [Giants] Bay City Ball
- [Giants] McCovey Chronicles
- [Marlins] FishStripes
- [Mets] Always Amazin’
- [Mets] Amazin’ Avenue
- [Mets] Blastings! Thrilledge
- [Mets] Metsmerized
- [Nationals] Nationals News Network
- [Nationals] The Nats Blog
- [Padres] Gaslamp Ball
- [Phillies] Balls, Sticks, and Stuff
- [Phillies] Crashburn Alley
- [Phillies] Huge Tiny Mistake
- [Phillies] Phillies Nation
- [Phillies] The Fightins
- [Phillies] The Good Phight
- [Pirates and Phillies] We Should Be GM’s
- [Pirates] Bucs Dugout
- [Reds] Red Reporter
- [Rockies] Inside the Rockies
- [Rockies] Purple Row
General Sports
- ArmchairGM
- Awful Announcing
- Can’t Stop the Bleeding
- Dan Shanoff
- Deadspin
- Hit By a Pitch
- Joe Posnanski
- Ladies…
- Obsessed With Sports
- One More Dying Quail
- Rotowire
- Rumors and Rants
- Signal to Noise
- SPORTSbyBROOKS
- Steroid Nation
- The Big Lead
- The Sporting Blog
- The Sports Hernia
- Vegas Watch
- With Leather
- Yardbarker
Other Stuff
Social Networking
banter

- B: Good article, Nick. Unfortunately, it looks like you don't ...
- Justin: Did you watch any giants games this year at all, or just loo...
- Gary: Fred Lewis had his chance and it did not work out. He will b...
- David: I have never seen a fanbase turn on someone like they turned...
- Julian: Obviously the writer of this article DOESN'T watch the Giant...
- Maxie Oakland: I could not agree with you more! I wish you rean the club. B...
- Patrick: Nate Schierholtz minor league career numbers: .307/.354/.516...
- Jim: Ryan Garko "ensconsed" at first base???...ummm, I don't thin...
- » What they need: Marlins;
- » What They Need: Minnesota Twins;
- » What They Need: Dodgers;
- » What They Need: Red Sox;
- » What They Need: Mariners;
- » Love your agent and you just gotta show it? Get a tattoo!;
- » Jimmy Rollins must bat leadoff no more forever;
- » What they need: Braves;
- » Johnny Damon Really Must Be Jesus;
- » What They Need: Yankees;
- » What They Need – San Francisco Giants: Some sort of vague semblance of an offense;
- » What they need: Phillies;
- Biz sense
- Bumped Umps
- CBB (Cute Baseball Babies)
- Diamond cuts
- Fantasy Spin
- Featury
- HBW (Hot Baseball Wives)
- Hot Offseason Action
- Interviews
- Liveblog
- News reel
- Picks
- Quick laughs
- Rant
- Reading
- Statshots
- Trivia
- UFH (Unfortunate Facial Hair)
- umpbump
- WYOC
- You Make The Call
- Get 1,000 qualified followers on Twitter
- Barry's Tickets has great deals on Dodgers Tickets, Angels Tickets, White Sox Tickets as well as all MLB Baseball Tickets
- Onlineseats.com is your best Stop for Arizona DiamondBacks Tickets, Colorado Rockies Tickets, Red Sox Tickets, Cubs Tickets and Angels Tickets
- Ticketspecialists carries Boston Red Sox Tickets, Dodgers Tickets, Detroit Tigers tickets, Atlanta Braves Tickets And Yankees tickets
Recently
Categories
marketplace
![]() |
Hot Tickets! |
follow umpbump on:


find umpbump on:

kindle store
Tag Cloud
View our complete tag list
Featured posts
November 8, 2009 - 12:25 pm
What they need: 2009-2010 offseason
Here we go again. Time for another edition of our semi-annual “What They Need” series, where we play GM for all 30 teams. As usual, we’ll be suggesting subtle tweaks for some squads, and major overhalls for others. There’s already movement going on in the Hot Stove front, so there’s no time to waste!
Here’s a [...]
September 3, 2009 - 11:20 am
Teams That Were Almost Great: 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers
The 2003 Los Angeles Dodgers had one of the greatest pitching staffs the game of baseball has ever known. At the height of the steroids era, in a season when 104 players would test positive for performance enhancing drugs, the Dodgers hurlers posted a 3.16 ERA, good enough for an insane 128 team ERA+, and [...]
August 31, 2009 - 11:19 am
Can the Nationals contend next season?
Okay, so at a time when most people are debating whether or not the Washington Nationals can even break .500 next season, this is going to sound more than a little crazy, but I think the Nats have an outside chance at contending next season.
I’m not saying it’s going to happen, but I am saying [...]
June 29, 2009 - 9:30 pm
The All-Hot Team
We here at Umpbump have done quite a few all-time teams. We’ve also cataloged quite a series of Hot Baseball Wives. In this post, I will attempt the acrobatic feat of bridging the twain. Yes, reader: The All-Hot Team.
For reasons of attention span, or specifically, the lack of it, I am focusing on current major [...]


December 10th, 2008 at 10:36 am
C.C. to the Yankees… MEH.
We all knew he was going to end up pinstriped in the end. I even
predicted the 160 million the other day.
I guess I’m happy though. There is no way C.C. can keep it up for another 7 years.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 10:44 am
I’m more interested in what this means for the pitching market as a whole. CC sets the high mark this year and everyone else falls in below him. I think this basically will mean that Lowe and Burnett will get more than they deserve. And probably Ollie Perez too, though less than the other two.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 10:48 am
I disagree, Paul. Now that the Yanks have their man, they won’t be in on the bidding for Lowe and Burnett, artificially inflating the price.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 10:54 am
From what I understand (and this is mere speculation), the Yankees will end up with one of Lowe/Burnett too.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 10:55 am
Also, note that the Yankees were seemingly in a bidding war for CC *with themselves.* No one could top their previous offer of $140MM/6 years. They had to throw in another year and another $20MM (give or take) to get him to come to NY, even though the other bidders couldn’t match their initial offer.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 10:57 am
If the Yankees end up with Lowe or Burnett on top of CC, not only will they be back as the team to beat in the AL, it will be clear that they have NO financial restrictions AT ALL.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:02 am
For what it’s worth, MLBTR relays a rumor that the Steinbrenners are now turning their attention to Manny Ramirez.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Having to top their own top bid is the funny part, yes. But CC had a right to do so and actually had some leverage… you know, because he’s fat.
The moment he struggles for more than two straight starts, the NY press is going to be all over his weight. They had a field day with Hideki Irabu (with great assistance from King George). CC didn’t have to deal with that and if he is going to, he wants to be compensated.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:07 am
I think CC was wise to hold out for more dough. The thing they always say about selling out is, if it bothers you that you’ve sold out, you should’ve held out for more money.
I think this is a great deal for the Yanks. They filled their greatest need (durable ace) by leveraging their chief competitive advantage (bottomless pockets). They’re not the Giants — even if they only get three or four good years out of this deal, if they win the World Series no one in NY will care.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:09 am
from MLBTR:
According to SI.com’s Jon Heyman, the Yankees were discussing a four-year, $66MM deal with Derek Lowe late Tuesday night. Via MetsBlog, Heyman said on WFAN this morning that the Yanks are closing in.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:17 am
I think Lowe makes sense for the Yankees because, while Burnett might be a better pitcher, Lowe is less likely to be injured. And the last thing the Yankees need is another injury-prone pitcher. They’ve already got Joba and Hughes.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:22 am
This is huge!!!
“The deal has an opt-out clause after the first three years, which are worth $69MM.”
That’s what got CC to sign, I bet. “Come to NY for three years. If you don’t like it, you can just leave.”
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:23 am
Ooooooooh…opt out! CC gets paid AND he can finish his career on the west coast. Score!
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:28 am
I am picturing CC in a muumuu, sipping Bahama Mama, and listening to Kenny Chesney. No shirt, no shoes, no problems….
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:39 am
Actually, the opt-out is great for the Yankees too. Since every player with an opt-out has taken it (I think?) they essentially signed Sabathia for 3 years, $69MM.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:47 am
I’m not sure if this is great for the Yankees. All the players who have taken advantage of their opt outs have done so because they thought they could get more money elsewhere. And they thought that because they were at the top of their games (See: Burnett, Drew). If CC opts out of his huge contract, it will be because he is healthy and pitching well and ready to cash in. In which case, I imagine the Yankees will be loathe to lose him. On the other hand, if he struggles the next three years or is consistently injured, he’ll probably just keep his contract, which would also be bad news for the Bombers.
Of course, a third scenario sees CC opting out of his contract regardless, just so he can pitch on the west coast and work on his tan.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 11:47 am
Me likey from the Yankees perspective.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
hmmmm cheeseburgers…
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
“Tom Haudricourt also learned from Melvin that Sabathia wanted an opt-out clause no matter where he signed, and the Brewers were prepared to offer one.”
Intriguing.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 12:06 pm
I just realized that the opt out might change the way a lot of people voted in our poll. I voted that the contract was too many years and too much money. But if the Yankees only end up with CC for three years, then I think they got a great deal.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
There’s another perspective here, too, which is that CC is the kind of teammate that makes “intangibles” tangible. He’ll pitch his arm off for New York if they ask him too. Hell, he’ll do it even if they *don’t* ask him too. He’ll demand the ball even if Girardi doesn’t want to give it to him. He’ll out-Jeter Derek Jeter. He’ll shame A-Rod into manning up. You don’t get that kind of boost to the clubhouse from signing Burnett or Lowe or Sheets. Plus, Sabathia easily puts up better numbers than any of them.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Sabathia probably puts up better numbers than all of them. Unless it turns out that a 300 pound pitcher who throws frequently on three days rest can’t keep it up forever and succumbs to injury or mediocrity. But what are the odds of that?
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Oddly enough, I predicted a three-year opt-out clause in my spoof post on the CC rumor mill:
http://umpbump.com/press/2008/12/08/cc-sabathia-rumors-monday/
I think I was kidding, though. I think I remember thinking, “What desperate move could the Giants pull to try and compete with New York’s money? I know, one of those gimmicky opt-out clauses! Har har har!”
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
According to Buster Olney:
In the meeting that Sabathia had with the Yankees, a question was asked in the room about whether there was an irreparable split between the two most dominant personalities in the room, A-Rod and Derek Jeter, and Yankees general manager Brian Cashman responded by talking about how the two men are just different.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
If the Yankees don’t sign Teixeira they are just treading water with the Sabathia signing. There offense which was mediocre at best last year will be even worse in 2009 with the loss of Giambi and Abreu.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
But Pat, a healthy Posada and a luckier Nick Swisher could mean a better Yankees offense.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/cc-sabathia-signs-with-yankees
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2008/12/10/688340/sabathia-to-new-york-for-1
I voted yes.
The only potential pitfall I see is injury risk. But I read pieces on his mechanics and his weight and came away unswayed that he’s any more prone than the next guy. Granted, injury can happen to anybody at anytime, so 7 years is always a huge risk.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 5:17 pm
I don’t think the Yankees should sign Tex. He wants too many years — and now New York is already on the hook for 7 years of Sabathia, assuming he doesn’t opt-out.
The Yanks’ primary concern this year was starting pitching. Now they have a front two of Sabathia and Wang — that’s pretty hot.
With that pitching, and if they can acquire some shorter-term offensive help (Manny Ramirez?) they can make a decent run in the next three years. And in the meantime, they can work on adding more young hitting talent to their farm system, which has been a little heavy on pitching of late.
REPORT COMMENT
December 10th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
Kensai, I couldn’t have said it better myself. Any of us could be hit by a bus tomorrow. Also, he’s 6′7″, so he wears it pretty well.
REPORT COMMENT
December 11th, 2008 at 10:20 am
Well, via MLBTR, I see that Jon Heyman says the Yankees are back in the hunt for Tex.
REPORT COMMENT
December 11th, 2008 at 10:28 am
If the Yankees sign CC, Burnett and Tex…well…jeez.
REPORT COMMENT
December 11th, 2008 at 11:21 am
I know. We’re back to the days of the Yankees trying to buy championships.
REPORT COMMENT
December 11th, 2008 at 11:30 am
More chatter: the Yankees remain interested in Derek Lowe (and will remain interested even if they sign Burnett), who apparently finds NY more appealing now that CC has signed there. There was also talk a while back that Peavy might find the Yankees more palatable if Sabathia joined them. If this is so, there’s clearly a huge ripple effect at work here that goes beyond the numbers Sabathia would put up during the season.
It’s worth mentioning that the Yankees are really only feigning interest in Tex to drive up the price for perennial postseason rivals the Angels and the Red Sox, just the way the Red Sox feigned interest in Sabathia to try and drive up the price for New York.
REPORT COMMENT