• HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian....
K-Rod the builder

K-Rod the builder?

It hasn’t been a good couple of days for Citigroup. After being publicly chastised by President Obama for seeking to buy a $50 million private jet after receiving a $45 billion bailout from the government, the ugly controversy surrounding its deal for the naming rights to the new Mets stadium has reared its head once again.

This time, it’s everybody’s favorite inquisitor, Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), along with representative Ted Poe (R-Texas), both of whom sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner requesting that the deal between the Mets and Citigroup be “dissolved.”

From Newsday:

In an interview yesterday, Kucinich said the financial behemoth is in no position to lay out cash to have its name on the Queens stadium. “It’s just totally unacceptable that Citigroup should be able to spend $400 million in naming rights when they’re the recipients of a massive federal bailout,” he said.

Kucinich and Poe wrote that Citigroup’s financial footing “has changed drastically” since the naming rights deal was struck in 2006. The agreement calls for Citigroup to pay $400 million over 20 years for the naming rights.

The Mets “are fully committed to our contract with Citigroup,” said Jay Horowitz, the team’s spokesman.

UmpBump readers were put to a vote as to what Citigroup and the Mets should do last time this little pickle was tickled, and the feeling (somewhat tongue-in-cheek) was that the stadium name ought to in some way reflect the fact that it was subsidized with public funds.

The sticky part about this whole mess is the inconvenient truth that Citigroup has yet to pay the bulk of the agreed upon amount. So while it continues to operate heaviy sedated with tax-payer money, it will be under contractual obligation to pay the Mets for naming rights for the next 20 years.

Given the recent, uhm, lapse in judgment about its ability to manage its financial priorities, however, Citigroup is in less of a position to just brush this PR fiasco away (much like the Mets did), and the truth of the matter is that as public outcry continues to grow, the Mets would rather have a packed nameless stadium, than an empty Citifield.

4 Responses to “Congress takes aim at Citifield naming deal”

  1. SCREW Congress! They need to get their heads out of there collective A$$e$ and trim the last stimulus bill down by $400 billion at least. These elitists are trying a social engineering experiment in the guise of an economic stimulus package…and these guys are worried about $400m? What a joke.

    The public better understand that this bill will cost our grand kids and their kids about $4,000 a year in additional taxes for the lives they don’t even have yet.

  2. Alejandro A. Leal says:

    Correction, Pedro, they’re worried about $400m that will be paid with your kid’s money.

    As far as future tax burdens, I think we were all pretty much screwed when your former President bloated the deficit with tax cuts for the stinking rich (who still manage to steal, see AIG, Madoff), and with an illegal war.

    I mean, what the fuck, didn’t Obama win?

    Wake up Pedro. There used to be a surplus, ya know…

  3. You go, Alejandro. Tell it. I think if Kucinich and you join forces this whole naming fiasco would be brought to a halt.
    This was a great post and an even better response to poor Pedro. I think “this little pickle was tickled,” should be the new Umpbump catch phrase.

  4. Alejandro A. Leal says:

    melissa… where you been? We missed you :(

    And yes, that pickle line was pure inspiration.

Leave a Reply

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]