• Joe: Just came across this. Interesting. Here's the way I would frame it: In the ...
13

Who is better? The Kansas City Royals or the Durham Bulls?

POSTED BY ON 1:42 am, February 19, 2009 - POSTED IN Diamond cuts

The recent cagey signing of Adam Kennedy to a minor league deal the other day is yet further evidence that the Rays under Andrew Friedman are just about the best run organization in baseball.

durhambullsNot only are the Rays stocked up and down the system with an incredible array of talented prospects, but they are also stocked in AAA Durham with an amazing collection of major-league ready talent.

These are not just replacement-level mediocrities playing out the string. Virtually everyone on the team could easily be starting in the majors for the right team, and would have a reasonable shot to perform above replacement level.

Check out the projected 2009 opening day starters and rotation of the Durham Bulls:

C John Jaso – .820 OPS last season in AAA
1B Chris Richard – 26 homers, .922 OPS last year in 467 AAA at-bats
2B Adam Kennedy – solid infield glove and .276 avg for 10 seasons in the Show
3B Morgan Ensberg – former All-Star 3B for the Astros is still only 33 years old
SS Reid Brignac – one of the top prospects in the Rays system
LF Justin Ruggiano – .911 OPS including 11 homers and 20 SB in 66 AAA games last year
CF Fernando Perez – 43 SB at AAA last year
RF Matt Joyce – 116 OPS plus for the Tigers last season

SP1 – David Price – 12-1, 2.30 ERA (minors), 0-0, 1.93 (MLB)
SP2 – Wade Davis – 4-2, 2.72 (9 AAA starts)
SP3 – Jeff Neimann – 9-5, 3.59 (AAA)
SP4 – Mitch Talbot – 13-9, 3.86 (AAA)
SP5 – Ben Hendrickson – 10-9, 4.58 (AAA)

So who would have a better record if this team played the Royals 2009 schedule?

In all honesty it would probably be the Royals, but the point is that the Rays are certainly in good shape with some cheap in-house solutions if they run into any injury woes this year.

Tagged: , , ,

13 comments so far

13 Responses to “Who is better? The Kansas City Royals or the Durham Bulls?”

  1. keith says:
    February 19, 2009 at 3:00 am

    really? you had to choose the Royals? not like, a team who actually sucks like the Mariners or Padres?

    hate to bring it to ya, while that is good depth, that team would almost assuredly lose 100 if you put them in the bigs.

    Report
    Reply
  2. Nick Kapur says:
    February 19, 2009 at 3:18 am

    Like I said, the Royals are better, but I might take Adam Kennedy over Willie Bloomquist.

    Report
    Reply
  3. keith says:
    February 19, 2009 at 3:55 am

    no argument from me there. :)

    Report
    Reply
  4. Cork says:
    February 19, 2009 at 6:49 am

    Niemann is out of options

    Report
    Reply
  5. Nick Kapur says:
    February 19, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    Ack, right you are Cork.

    Who is likely to be their other starter at AAA if Neimann starts the year up with the big club?

    Report
    Reply
  6. Matt says:
    February 19, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    This is silly. The Royals will compete in the central. That Durham Bulls team would lose 130 games or more in the majors.

    Report
    Reply
  7. Paul Moro says:
    February 19, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Matt, you may be right about the Royals “competing”. But that’s because the AL Central is going to be really bad. 86 wins may take it and the Royals could win in the mid-70s.

    But do you know how hard it is for a team to lose 130 games? The Bulls have enough talent that they may not be the worst.

    Report
    Reply
  8. Doug A. Milhoan says:
    February 19, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Lefthander James Houser will be in Durham’s rotation, possibly Jeremy Cummings too.

    Report
    Reply
  9. Milton Friedman says:
    February 19, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Hellickson is a couple of months away from Durham, look out SD/SEA!

    Report
    Reply
  10. J.D. says:
    March 4, 2009 at 4:54 am

    Dude, shameless rip-off.

    Report
    Reply
  11. Sarah Green says:
    March 4, 2009 at 10:31 am

    JD, fangraphs didn’t rip us off. They just had a very similar idea three weeks after we did. We love fangraphs.

    Report
    Reply
  12. Will says:
    April 25, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    haven’t you noticed, the Royals are slowing improving– as of right now they hold first place.

    Report
    Reply
  13. Nick Kapur says:
    April 25, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    I agree that Zack Greinke has improved dramatically.

    The rest of the Royals, I’m not sure about yet.

    Report
    Reply

Leave a Reply

February 18, 2013

Another tough break for Gamel

February 12, 2013

Montero’s assessment not necessarily a reflection on Bauer

    Recent Comments

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need [...]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already [...]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we [...]

Marketplace