• HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian....

Earlier this week the Arizona Republic’s Paola Boivin made her case that Dan Haren should get the all-star game start instead of Tim Lincecum:

Like Haren, San Francisco’s Lincecum, 25, has pitched brilliantly, but Haren, 28, has a better ERA (2.01 vs. 2.33), better opponent batting average (.219 vs. 270) and better strikeouts-to-walk ratio (8.06 vs. 4.38). Lincecum has a better record (10-2 vs. 9-5) and more strikeouts (149 to 129).

It’s an argument of semantics, a divisive debate about statistics.

After conceding that both pitchers are more or less equally qualified, Boivin proceeded to argue that Haren should get the start because “he’s a reality check” and is unafraid to challenge his teammates when they’re struggling.

But you know what, Paola? Lincecum has an awesome mullet. And when the choice is between two similar pitchers, one who’s a clubhouse leader and one who’s got phenomenal hair that is half ironic fashion statement and half tribute to teammate and 300 game winner Randy Johnson, I’m going with the hair every time.

I’m glad to see Manuel feels the same.

Now, if Haren took a page from teammate Clay Zavada and grew an awesome handle-bar mustache, that might tip the scales a bit.

3 Responses to “Lincecum locks down all-star game start”

  1. Nick Kapur says:

    Oof, I really dislike how so many people say things like “it’s an argument of semantics” when the argument has nothing at all to do with semantics. This is one of the most egregious examples I’ve seen in a long time. Do these people even know what that word means? Clearly not. No wonder newspapers are dying.

  2. Yeah, she flubbed that one. But you’ve got to give her credit for fun use of alliteration with the phrase “divisive debate about statistics.”

  3. Lyndsay says:

    when I see that photo of Lincecum, I just wanna go, “You know that Julie girl? Loves you. You want her? Gotta play it cool, you know. Like, if she asks you if you want a ride, you say, No, I’ve got my own ride, but maybe I’ll see you there. Sounds stupid, doesn’t it? It works.”

Leave a Reply

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]