• Joe: Just came across this. Interesting. Here's the way I would frame it: In the ...
17

When Anniversaries Go Wrong: 1969 NY Mets

POSTED BY ON 5:26 pm, August 3, 2009 - POSTED IN Quick laughs

This year marks the 40th Anniversary of the Miracle Mets championship of 1969. To commemorate the franchise’s first World Series win, the Mets are giving away 25,000 t-shirts at the August 22nd game versus the Philadelphia Phillies. Which sounds great.

But these t-shirts look like this.

tshirt_citi_180x150

I swear to Jehovah, this is not a joke. I got this photo directly from the team website. Men, women, and children will receive t-shirts numbered 69. Not only that, there will no doubt be thousands of Phillies fans in attendance who will also be getting this t-shirt, which they will be bringing back to Philadelphia. Imagine the fun they’re gonna have at the expense of Mets fans for the rest of their lives.

So to the Mets’ Marketing Department – what the hell?

Tagged: , , ,

17 comments so far

17 Responses to “When Anniversaries Go Wrong: 1969 NY Mets”

  1. Lyndsay says:
    August 4, 2009 at 1:08 am

    what’s wrong with that?
    those were the best days of my life!

    Report
    Reply
  2. Angel says:
    August 4, 2009 at 10:21 am

    Is that really so bad? It’s pretty simple and clean looking. So many other things you can rip the Mets about that now you have to find everything wrong.

    Report
    Reply
  3. Sarah Green says:
    August 4, 2009 at 10:38 am

    Maybe the Mets know that their target demo is a 15-year old boy. Or at least, grown men with the sense of humor of a 15-year old boy?

    Report
    Reply
  4. Franco says:
    August 4, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    Wow.. it says 69…. Did Beavis or Butthead write this story? It’s a tribute to the 69 team… my god you are a clown

    Report
    Reply
  6. Omar says:
    August 4, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    Who’s the sleazy douchebag again, Paul?

    Report
    Reply
  7. Sarah Green says:
    August 5, 2009 at 9:45 am

    Omar, I’m still waiting for you to drop your mad baseball knowledge on the dumb broads who write/read this site. Go for it, big guy!

    Report
    Reply
  8. JRJR says:
    August 5, 2009 at 9:51 am

    We are already having fun at the Mets expense.

    Report
    Reply
  9. Paul Moro says:
    August 5, 2009 at 9:58 am

    We obviously understand that the “69″ is a reference to the 1969 team. But I don’t think that the average baseball fan even knows that that’s the year the Mets won. Therefore, they’re just going to assume that you’re the kind of person who had this custom made because “69″ is the upper limit of your imagination and humor.

    There were many other ways that the marketing department could have gone with this. They didn’t have to make it into a replica jersey style. It could have been avoided.

    All I know is, I will never wear this t-shirt.

    Report
    Reply
  10. Ace says:
    August 5, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Wait, how can Phillies fans use this to have fun “at the expense of Mets fans for the rest of their lives” ? If one reads the number for its sexual connotation, it implies that the wearer is a mutual oral sex enthusiast. What’s wrong with that, exactly?

    Report
    Reply
  11. acmesalesrep says:
    August 5, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    Ace:

    Nothing wrong with it — until some Phillies fan takes the shirt to his local sporting goods shop and gets “PIAZZA” ironed on where the nameplate would go if it were a real jersey.

    Report
    Reply
  12. Ace says:
    August 5, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    acmesalesrep:
    I still fail to see where this would be a source of embarrassment. The Phillie fan in your scenario would be implying Piazza enjoys the sex position connoted by the number. I don’t see how that’s anything near embarrassing.

    Is there a social stigma attached to 69-ing that I’m missing?

    Report
    Reply
  13. chris lucas says:
    August 6, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    ace – the social stigma against homosexuality and the rumors regarding mike piazza’s sexual preference would be a good place to start.

    Report
    Reply
  14. Ace says:
    August 8, 2009 at 10:58 am

    Chris Lucas:
    But the connotations of the number 69 are ungendered and imply no particular sexual preference. The issues surrounding Piazza’s sexuality (and the stigmas attached to that) are a separate issue. Do questions about Mike Piazza’s sexuality paint everything identified with the Mets? If the point I’m missing is that a homophobic Phillies fan might alter, at his own expense, a t-shirt advertising a rival team that he received for purchasing a ticket to the rival team’s stadium so as to suggest that Mike Piazza enjoys 69ing (and, because of context taken from back in the first Bush term, suggests that he enjoys 69-ing men), then I’m afraid I don’t think that this is a major problem. If the hypothetical Phillies fan would have to alter the shirt, then the hypothetical “blame” for the insignificant “situation” would not lie with the organizations that distributed and designed the shirts, but rather with the hypothetical person that re-designed it.
    I mean, nothing’s stopping a Phillie’s fan from ordering a Piazza Mets jersey now and changing the numbers to 69 (or something more direct, like a picture of men having sex).

    Report
    Reply
  15. Jesus saves, Rollie fingers says:
    August 10, 2009 at 2:22 am

    I’m stoned and this is a confusing conversation. I rather be f*****g.

    Report
    Reply
  16. Jesus saves, Rollie fingers says:
    August 10, 2009 at 2:23 am

    woops… stone

    Report
    Reply
  17. Russ says:
    August 21, 2009 at 10:28 am

    I’m a lifelong Mets fan, and the only thing that embarasses me about this shirt is the giant CITI logo on the sleeve.

    If you think this is embarassing because of the “69,” you must be 14 years old.

    Report
    Reply

Leave a Reply

February 18, 2013

Another tough break for Gamel

February 12, 2013

Montero’s assessment not necessarily a reflection on Bauer

    Recent Comments

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need [...]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already [...]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we [...]

Marketplace