• Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor l...

So ESPN’s “Baseball Tonight” and ESPN.com have started pushing Buck Showalter’s plan for realigning baseball.  But if you take even a minute to think through what Buck is proposing, his plan makes no sense at all!

buck_showwalterEven setting aside the most glaring flaw, which is that Buck’s plan proposes contracting two teams as if that were totally a simple matter, and completely ignores what an utter disaster the previous attempt at contraction was, the plan has another glaring inconsistency which both Buck and co-conspirator Steve Berthiaume seem completely oblivious to.

If you watch the video, Buck first lays out how he is going to get rid of the unbalanced schedule, so that each team is going to play every other team in baseball exactly 6 times per season, 3 games at home and three away. But then right after that, he unveils his four new divisions, and he and Berthiaume proceed to prattle on about how great these new divisions are going to be, because all the teams in each division will be in the same time zone, which will supposedly enhance regional rivalries, cut down on flight times, and prevent fans from having to stay up late to watch games in distant time zones.

Huh??

If Buck’s plan is carried out and each team plays every other team 6 times, then why are these divisions even necessary at all? None of the alleged benefits of these new divisions that Buck and Berthiaume spend so much time praising will come to pass at all if each team plays every other team exactly 6 times. Teams will have to fly farther, more often, fans will have even more games outside their time zone they’ll have to stay up late for, and regional rivalries will be much reduced because the fans will only see that rival team three times a year.

In fact, all the supposed advantages Buck touts for his new divisions were exactly why baseball returned to the unbalanced schedule in 1997, the same unbalanced schedule which Buck hates so much and wants to now eliminate. By playing each team in the division 18 or 19 times, there is less flying, more games at reasonable hours, and enhanced rivalries.

In other words, part A of Buck’s plan completely cancels out part B! It’s like these are pieces of two completely separate and incompatible plans! But nobody at ESPN seems to have noticed!

In fact, given Buck’s playoff proposal, which is based solely on record, rather than division, there is absolutely no point in having divisions at all!  You might as well just have one single 28-team division, if the teams are all going to have the same schedule anyway, and you’re just going to take the four teams with the four best records plus two wild cards.

Crazy Buck Showalter.

Stupid ESPN.

4 Responses to “Buck Showalter’s realignment plan makes no sense at all!”

  1. I think Buck should be the one to tell the city of Miami that the new stadium that they just started building isn’t going to be necessary, after all.

  2. I stopped listening after he said that they’d contract the Marlins and the Rays because Florida has ‘spring training’.

  3. Eh, it’s admirable that he wants to balance the schedule. But calling the AL and NL archaic is not the way to do it. Me I’d like to see 4 leagues, 8 teams apiece (two expansion teams obviously which isn’t really feasible right now but I’m sure eventually it will be). 22 games x 7 teams a league = 154 games, which is the old schedule used before 1960 and has the benefit of shortening the season so we aren’t playing baseball in November. Top team in each league advances to the postseason.

  4. I posted the video: http://thefairball.com/2009/08/buck-showalters-mlb-realignment-idea/

    I agree 2000% on this, I would bet some intern made up this plan on the fly and he read it like it was his own idea. It seems to have no thought to it at all.

    Espn Sunday night Baseball has the Yanks vs. Soxs 4 times this season and now they will only play 6 times all year?

    Contraction is not the answer at all.

    I had my own idea for realignment:
    http://thefairball.com/2009/06/mlb-realignment-plan/

    Visit and Comment:

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.
    • David the okajima: was wondering if I related too this guy?
    • HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian.
    • handsomerandyblackladdiebrad1953: Plus,Jackson’s Polo Grounds-heightened batting stats,when park-adjusted,make...

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]