<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On WPA; Or, why Johnny Damon is your 2009 AL MVP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/</link>
	<description>In-your-face baseball commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:19:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kapur</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/comment-page-1/#comment-61673</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6832#comment-61673</guid>
		<description>Jimmy~ No, it does not. It uses the winning percentage of all teams ever before and after that given event. If you calculated WPA differently for different teams, there would be no way to compare players on different teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy~ No, it does not. It uses the winning percentage of all teams ever before and after that given event. If you calculated WPA differently for different teams, there would be no way to compare players on different teams.
<div class="report"><span id="reportcomment_results_div_61673"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 61673 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/comment-page-1/#comment-61650</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6832#comment-61650</guid>
		<description>i really like this statistic. contributions in tight situations is what interest me. one question. does wpa factor in winninmg percentages of teams and their likelihood of winning. for example yanks vs. washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really like this statistic. contributions in tight situations is what interest me. one question. does wpa factor in winninmg percentages of teams and their likelihood of winning. for example yanks vs. washington.
<div class="report"><span id="reportcomment_results_div_61650"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 61650 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kapur</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/comment-page-1/#comment-61618</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6832#comment-61618</guid>
		<description>In case it&#039;s not clear for some reason, I personally am not actually arguing for WPA to be used to evaluate the MVP. My point is just that if sportswriters actually want to evaluate what they claim to want to evaluate, then *they* should be using WPA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case it&#8217;s not clear for some reason, I personally am not actually arguing for WPA to be used to evaluate the MVP. My point is just that if sportswriters actually want to evaluate what they claim to want to evaluate, then *they* should be using WPA.
<div class="report"><span id="reportcomment_results_div_61618"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 61618 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kensai</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/comment-page-1/#comment-61614</link>
		<dc:creator>kensai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6832#comment-61614</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an argument to be made here, but I still don&#039;t like using WPA in any value argument because it is still a matter of opportunity to make a difference rather than skill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an argument to be made here, but I still don&#8217;t like using WPA in any value argument because it is still a matter of opportunity to make a difference rather than skill.
<div class="report"><span id="reportcomment_results_div_61614"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 61614 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Action Jackson</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/comment-page-1/#comment-61582</link>
		<dc:creator>Action Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6832#comment-61582</guid>
		<description>Something like Bay&#039;s first 12 home runs this year came with men on base, I&#039;d imagine that&#039;s the kind of things that bumps up your WPA.

I also wonder if the defense statistics give Bay a bad rap because they don&#039;t take park dimensions into account... at Fenway, a lot of fly balls that Bay would have gotten to end up off the wall (or even in the Monster seats).  I remember that the Pirates used to play Bay in center occasionally, he has some speed (12/14 for steals this year, 10/10 last year), and he plays the wall well enough at Fenway, so I don&#039;t entirely understand how he can be as terrible on defense as the statistics claim.  Did he have the same kind of poor defense statistics last year, or in 2007 with the Pirates (in a different home park)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something like Bay&#8217;s first 12 home runs this year came with men on base, I&#8217;d imagine that&#8217;s the kind of things that bumps up your WPA.</p>
<p>I also wonder if the defense statistics give Bay a bad rap because they don&#8217;t take park dimensions into account&#8230; at Fenway, a lot of fly balls that Bay would have gotten to end up off the wall (or even in the Monster seats).  I remember that the Pirates used to play Bay in center occasionally, he has some speed (12/14 for steals this year, 10/10 last year), and he plays the wall well enough at Fenway, so I don&#8217;t entirely understand how he can be as terrible on defense as the statistics claim.  Did he have the same kind of poor defense statistics last year, or in 2007 with the Pirates (in a different home park)?
<div class="report"><span id="reportcomment_results_div_61582"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 61582 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kapur</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/comment-page-1/#comment-61580</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6832#comment-61580</guid>
		<description>Yep. Well, for one thing, just like most MVP voters, WPA completely ignores defense. But also, Bay&#039;s hits this year have just happened to come in really high leverage situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Well, for one thing, just like most MVP voters, WPA completely ignores defense. But also, Bay&#8217;s hits this year have just happened to come in really high leverage situations.
<div class="report"><span id="reportcomment_results_div_61580"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 61580 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Green</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/comment-page-1/#comment-61579</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6832#comment-61579</guid>
		<description>Am shocked that Bay is so high. Really?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am shocked that Bay is so high. Really?!
<div class="report"><span id="reportcomment_results_div_61579"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment( 61579 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report</a></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  umpbump.com/press/2009/09/09/on-wpa-or-why-johnny-damon-is-your-2009-al-mvp/feed/ ) in 0.27228 seconds, on Jul 31st, 2010 at 6:47 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jul 31st, 2010 at 7:02 pm UTC -->