<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are lots of big boppers a good thing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/10/are-lots-of-big-boppers-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/10/are-lots-of-big-boppers-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>In-your-face baseball commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kensai</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/10/are-lots-of-big-boppers-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-61613</link>
		<dc:creator>kensai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6848#comment-61613</guid>
		<description>I wonder if that&#039;s more a factor of teams spending money on offense rather than pitching or defense or other factors.  Or the rest of their lineups being shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if that&#8217;s more a factor of teams spending money on offense rather than pitching or defense or other factors.  Or the rest of their lineups being shit.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_61613"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 61613 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_61613"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kapur</title>
		<link>http://umpbump.com/press/2009/09/10/are-lots-of-big-boppers-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-61586</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umpbump.com/press/?p=6848#comment-61586</guid>
		<description>I still remember when the Dodgers did this back in 1997. I think they just scraped by when Todd Zeile hit a homer on the last day of the season or something.

I remember it seemed like a really huge deal back at the time, because it had only been done three times before, and two of those were the pre-humidor Coors Field Rockies, which is pretty easily discounted.

But then the steroids era got going in earnest, and tiny, band-box parks like Citizens and Great American got built, and now lo, 8 more teams have done it in just over 10 years.

It&#039;s still weird to me though, that two of the first five teams were the Dodgers, and the other three were Rockies. I mean, by all available evidence, Dodger Stadium is not, and has never been, a very home run friendly ballpark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still remember when the Dodgers did this back in 1997. I think they just scraped by when Todd Zeile hit a homer on the last day of the season or something.</p>
<p>I remember it seemed like a really huge deal back at the time, because it had only been done three times before, and two of those were the pre-humidor Coors Field Rockies, which is pretty easily discounted.</p>
<p>But then the steroids era got going in earnest, and tiny, band-box parks like Citizens and Great American got built, and now lo, 8 more teams have done it in just over 10 years.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still weird to me though, that two of the first five teams were the Dodgers, and the other three were Rockies. I mean, by all available evidence, Dodger Stadium is not, and has never been, a very home run friendly ballpark.
<p>
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_61586"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="reportComment_AddTextArea( 61586 );" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">Report this comment</a></span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_61586"></span>
			</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
