• HaroldHecuba: Mike Mussina is EASTERN EUROPEAN, not Italian....

Tony ReaginsGM Tony Reagins and his front office crew deserve a lot of credit. The decision to let Mark Teixeira walk a year ago ought to be remembered as a great case study in how even deep-pocketed teams should be playing the market.  Instead of committing really long-term to Teixeira (who as we all know signed with the Yankees for 8 years and $180M), they recognized that they had a more than suitable replacement right there in Kendry Morales. What more, they let well-known and over-valued players such as Garrett Anderson and Francisco Rodriguez go as well,  bringing in Bobby Abreu and Brian Fuentes for a fraction of what the Mets had to pay to bring K-Rod to Queens. Now those are some smart moves.

Which makes me very curious as to how the Angels will play the market this time around. Much like a year ago, the front office has some tough decisions to make in regards to what they’d like their roster to look like come April. It’s difficult to think of the Angels going into Opening Day without the likes of free agents Vlad Guerrero, Chone Figgins, John Lackey, and Kelvim Escobar. But that is a possible scenario. While I fully understand the sentiment that you shouldn’t blow up a 97-win team, what must be taken into account are future repercussions. If they sign both Figgins and Lackey to long-term deals, their finances in 2012 would probably be a mess. So the Angels should be putting on their thinking caps here.

I’ve talked a bit about Figgins before. The third baseman was very arguably the MVP of the team last year but I have a hard time understanding how the market will value him. I’d confidently bet money on his production slipping at least a bit and that whoever signs him may be disappointed. Instead, the Angels could take a gamble on a guy like Troy Glaus, whose 2009 season was basically thrown out due to a slow recovery from shoulder surgery. But Glaus was still a productive bat prior to going under the knife and he may be willing to sign the former Angel to a one-year deal to prove his health. Or they may decide to finally give the job full time to Brandon Wood, whose very strong numbers in AAA are yet to translate to big league success. If I were Reagins, I’d let Figgins walk, collect the draft picks (he’s a Type A who’s been offered arbitration) and use my money elsewhere.

And that’s money they may need if they decide to close the books on the Vlad Guerrero era. His last two seasons featured injuries and declining production. Even moving him to DH didn’t keep him healthy and I don’t think there’s much reason to be optimistic with him. It would make sense if Bobby Abreu was moved to DH and the Angels looked for a corner OF bat. With the $15M salary that Vlad received in 2009 coming off the books, the Angels may become a player in the Matt Holliday sweepstakes (though owner Arte Moreno denies it).Kelvim Escobar

On the pitching side, the Angels already have four legitimate starters in Ervin Santana, Joe Saunders, Jered Weaver, and Scott Kazmir. But are they enough? I think it would be smart of the Angels to bring aboard at least two more SPs given the injury history of Santana, the rocky season from Kazmir, and the fact that Joe Saunders inevitably came back down to earth after an unlikely 2008 season.  I would personally pass on Lackey unless he’s willing to take a HUGE discount to return to Anaheim, but resigning Kelvim Escobar to a one year contract isn’t the worst idea at all. And even if the Halos can’t bring Lackey back, signing guys like Joel Pinero and/or Randy Wolf to shorter deals may be the more prudent thing to do anyway.

Given the fact that the Angels were 10 games ahead of second-place Texas, I would think that even a small downgrade for the sake of some fiscal sanity would still result in a playoff berth. But the last thing that the Angels should be doing is committing loads of money and years to players like Figgins, Guerrero, and Lackey, who all have nowhere to go but down. It may very well hurt from a PR perspective, but the Halos would probably be better off finding an alternate route to October.

- What They Need Index -

2 Responses to “What They Need: Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (the name is still ridiculous)”

  1. Joe Saunders came back down the earth because of some shoulder trouble, but rebounded nicely after a stint on the DL. He’s still a solid guy in their rotation and remains one of the more under-rated pitchers in the game, IMO. Kazmir wasn’t very good prior to arriving in Anahiem, but a trip to visit his college pitching coach helped turn him around and he was outstanding down the stretch for the Angels (at least until the post-season). Both should be fine in 2010.

    That being said, the Angels still need a top of the rotation guy and their best option remains to be John Lackey. At lesat with Lackey they know exactly what they’re going to get. The price is too steep to acquire anyone else.

    I would be fine with the Angels resigning Lackey and letting Figgins walk.

    Speaking of Figgy… well, the Phillies didn’t do anyone any favors when they signed Polanco for three years and $18 million. Using that standard, Figgy should see a huge pay day.

  2. The California Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, Los Angeles, California

Leave a Reply

Marketplace

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Archives

What's Popular

Featured posts

220px-Bbwaa_logo_web

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

According to the internet, "The Little Napoleon" John McGraw was the greatest manager of all time.

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]