The dust is yet to settle after yesterday’s fiasco involving Washington Nationals Manager Jim Riggleman and team GM Mike Rizzo, but if the Twittersphere is any gauge, many remain bewildered by the sudden turn of events in the nation’s capital.  Few understand why Riggleman had chosen such a boisterous occasion – the Nationals were minutes removed from a walk-off victory that pushed the team over .500 in June for the first time since 2005 – to resign abruptly and leave the organization without a defined managerial presence.  The truth appears to be that, as The Nats Blog points out, Riggleman had grown frustrated with what he saw as an unfair contract situation: Rizzo had signed a five-year extension as GM last off-season and had refused to pick up Riggleman’s contract option that would have kept him in place for the 2012 campaign.  Frustration mounted for Riggleman throughout this season as it became clear that his job security was still in doubt despite a recent stretch that saw the Nationals play arguably their best baseball in franchise history, winning 11 of 12 games.

I, for one, don’t blame Riggleman for his last-ditch effort to try to latch onto what has the potential to be one of the National League’s long-term surprises.  Riggleman didn’t see himself in the future plans for the Nationals although he desperately wanted to be there.  So, in an attempt to manufacture leverage and secure a contract extension, he used a common negotiation tactic: establish a concrete time deadline in order to create a sense of urgency.  For anyone that watches ABC’s Shark Tank, Mark Cuban has done this effectively throughout his guest appearances when attempting to lock up a deal without being bid up by competing sharks.  On more than one occasion, Cuban has given small business owners twenty seconds to decide whether or not they will accept his funding offer, after which the offer expires.  Similarly, Riggleman probably figured that after an 8-1 homestand, the proverbial ball was in his court, thus the declaration to Rizzo that he would resign as Nationals manager immediately following yesterday’s game if his contract were not extended.  From a bystander’s point-of-view, the percentages were clearly in Riggleman’s favor: would Rizzo truly endure the PR nightmare that would undoubtedly ensue if he were to fire his manager after the best stretch in team history?  Unfortunately for Riggleman and Nationals fans, the answer was yes.

What you may not learn in Negotiations 101 is that when time deadlines go awry, they really go awry.   Urgency can lead to inefficient outcomes, as was clearly the case for Riggleman and the entire Nationals organization.  If Rizzo went home last night and thought of this as a negotiation victory, I urge him to rethink his stance.  This was unfortunately a lose-lose for both parties.

4 Responses to “Why You Shouldn’t Blame Jim Riggleman”

  1. I have little sympathy for Riggleman. He wanted more job security. We all do. But baseball manager is not a job that offers much security. What is does offer is a six-figure salary. And that ain’t bad.

    I have slightly more sympathy for football players and other folks whose contracts aren’t guaranteed. But in baseball, where teams are stuck paying you even if they don’t want you around anymore, it seems the least a player or manager can do is honor the contract he signed.

    I wonder if this will make other teams less likely to hire Riggleman in the future?

  2. I’m not suggesting that I have sympathy for Riggleman. I just don’t blame him for trying to leverage the team’s hot streak into a contract extension, specifically since he had little to lose (most argue that his contract would not have been extended or renewed at the end of this season). He basically took a calculated risk and gambled with three months worth of salary, but the move (i.e. negotiation technique) backfired. From a business sense, I’m still fascinated by the whole process but would have liked to have seen Riggleman “win the negotiation” using the deadline technique.

  3. Danny O says:

    I side with Riggleman here, and agree that everyone lost. But both sides accomplished something here: Riggleman and Rizzo each sent a message to the world that they are not to be messed with. Might help each party in future negotiations.

  4. I think it was Shimon Peres, the Israeli politician who said that whenever you make a deal, you should try not to make to too god for you because that means it is of little use to the other party involved. Now we see that the man was right.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]