The Philadelphia Inquirer’s Phil Sheridan has a new(ish) column and the gist is this: The Phillies offense stinks this season, and that proves Ryan Howard is great.

I disagree for the following reasons:

1. Compared to last season, the Phillies’ offense hasn’t been that bad. The Phils are averaging 4.3 runs per game this season, after averaging 4.4 per game in 2011 (and only 4.17 runs through the all-star break in 2011).

2. Compared to other teams in the league this season, the Phillies’ offense hasn’t been that bad. Only 5 NL teams have scored more runs.

3. Sheridan’s assertion that Howard’s clutchness is what the Phils are missing is not really true, either. Only four NL teams have a higher average with runners in scoring position this season (and, for what it’s worth, the Yankees have a terrible team batting average with RISP and they’re in first place in baseball’s toughest division). I mean, yes, every team could use somebody to get clutch hits. And, yes, Howard had a high batting average with runners in scoring position last season (.298)(though not as high as Hunter Pence, Jimmy Rollins or even Chooch Ruiz). But that doesn’t mean Howard is clutch. He had a much lower average with RISP in 2010 (.275) and lower still in 2009 (.267). Clutchness just isn’t a skill that many players posses, if any players do.

Sheridan’s misunderstanding of what ails the Phils aside, what really bugged me about the column was the subtext; it was, at heart, a defense of Howard’s much maligned contract:

On the one extreme, you have the stat crunchers, who can prove with mathematical certainty that Howard should be grateful to be playing in a semipro league somewhere. On the other extreme, you have those of us who think Howard has an impact on games well beyond his own OPS numbers.

This statement misrepresents the opinions expressed by most credible baseball analysts at the time Howard signed his wholly unnecessary contract extension. You didn’t hear people say, “He sucks!” You heard a lot of people say, “What’s the rush?” When Howard signed his deal, he was still two years away from free agency. It made no sense to lock him up that far in advance, considering his age, body type, and the fact that he was scheduled to hit free agency at the same time as Albert Pujols and Prince Fielder.

But if Howard’s contract was hotly debated at the time he signed, it is no longer. The extension was a mistake, plain and simple. That much became clear the second we learned that Howard tore his Achilles tendon, an injury that has derailed his 2012 season and possibly his career.

Of course, hindsight is 20/20. But that’s the point! Sheridan has the benefit of hindsight and he’s still defending Howard’s contract extension. Come on Phil. The “stat crunchers” have won this argument. Let it go.

2 Responses to “Philly’s struggles don’t prove Howard is great”

  1. Coley Ward, this article is terrible. First, try using spell check. Second, Howard’s contract is not as bad as before when you look at the contracts that Pujols and Fielder got, which are absolutely ridiculous. Third, Howard’s career is not finished whatsoever. This season is not even a bust for him, as he is likely to play right after the all-star break.

  2. Joe, let’s talk at the end of the season. My suspicion is that Howard will struggle this season, as recovering from a torn Achilles tendon isn’t easy. But even if he plays at the same level he played at last season, that still wouldn’t make him a top-10 first baseman. And he’s being paid like he’s an elite player. The annual value of his contract is second only to A-Rod.

    I won’t defend the contracts Pujols and Fielder got. Those were insane (especially since it seems Pujols’ decline has already begun in earnest). But the Phillies clearly erred by signing Howard to that extension. And there’s no doubt that if RAJ had it to do over again, he would do things differently.

    BTW, I couldn’t figure out what you thought I spelled wrong. I can only assume you saw “Philly’s” in the post title and assumed I meant “Phillies.” I didn’t.

Leave a Reply

    Recent Comments

    • planet hobbywood: This is very interesting.
    • Bren: He is a awesome player and a good man.. sweet.. polite.. friendly.. down to earth.. he never acted as though he...
    • HADAJUN( Japanese): Okajima a Japanese hero?
    • Rickt: I am the biggest Cal Jr fan around but one of my good friends played minor league baseball in the Orioles...
    • HADAJUN: I wish for play in Japan. The death is regrettable.


    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:


Featured posts

December 5, 2011

Will anybody get elected to the Hall of Fame this year?

Last week, we asked you to vote for who you would like to see enshrined in baseball’s Hall of Fame. The verdict? If it were up to UmpBump readers, nobody would make it in. The leading vote getter (so far) is Jeff Bagwell, who has 60% support. Of course, in the real voting, players need […]

January 5, 2011

Annual UmpBump Hall of Fame Balloting: 2011 Edition

In what has become an annual tradition, we here at UmpBump cast our ballots for the Hall of Fame on the eve of the announcements of the voting for the real Hall of Fame. Voters can vote for anyone ever who has been retired from baseball for at least five years and is not already […]

October 19, 2010

Crowdsourcing the Greats: The Top 10 Managers of All Time

Now that we’ve looked at every position on the diamond, as well as relief pitchers, we are nearing the end of our “Crowdsourcing the Greats” series. But before we finish, let’s turn one more time to the internet hoi polloi for answers on who the greatest baseball manager of all time was. As usual, we […]