Mets opt not to rename Citi Field; don’t care what you think

Citi Field it is...
As expected, the Mets are going to keep their $400 million (thank you) and not rename Citi Field.
“The company is still an ongoing company and a vital company that is doing business around the globe,” Mets chief operating officer Jeff Wilpon said Tuesday. “The taxpayers are backstopping what’s going on in the global economy. It’s not really Citi’s fault that they’re in this problem. There are a lot of other banks in the same situation — with naming-rights deals, also.”
Last week I asked UmpBump readers whether the Mets should rename Citi Field given the current economic turmoil surrounding Citigroup (the people obviously behind the naming rights).
Though not an overwhelming majority, 34% of you did vote for a name change that would somehow allude to the fact that the government dipped twice into tax payers’ wallets, first by subsidizing construction of the ballpark and most recently by bailing out Citigroup.
Here are the final results.
Should the Mets change the name of their new stadium?
- Yes, call it People's Field or something alluding the double subsidy it got from taxpayers. (34%, 38 Votes)
- They should, but they won't cuz it's $400 million. Would you return $400 mil? (31%, 35 Votes)
- I don't give a crap what they call it; with this economy, I couldn't afford a hot dog in there! (24%, 27 Votes)
- No, Citi Field is fine as it is. (11%, 12 Votes)
Total Voters: 112
I voted for the “I don’t give a crap” option, not because I didn’t think the Mets should’ve renamed it, but because I believe there are bigger things at work here. Like, uhm, a crumbling economy. And I also happen to think that a multi-million dollar naming-rights deal by a financial institution getting bailed out by Congress is an example of said crumbling economy. But I digress…
16 Comments »
Should the Mets rename Citi Field?

As the financial turmoil surrounding Citigroup unfolded this past week, resulting in the proposed bailout by Congress (and you and me), a very pertinent question that at one point seemed a settled matter popped into the minds of many: Is it fair that the word “Citi” as in “Citigroup” is associated with the Mets’ new stadium, aka Citi Field?
In 2006, Citigroup signed a 20-year deal with the Mets, worth $400 million, in order to provide a name and a sponsor to the team’s new home. Now that the financial institution is the latest behemoth to fall prey to the mortgage crisis and the bad economy, that deal is begining to rub some people the wrong way – especially so after Citi announced massive layoffs of historic proportions.
So far Citi has maintained that their “commitment to the Mets and [the] new ball park is firm,” as Jay Horwitz, the team’s Vice President for media relations, told mlb.com last week.
Steve Silverman, spokesman for Citi, told the New York Times that their commitment to the Mets is firm; “it’s important to us,” he said.
But the Citi bailout isn’t going down easy. This week’s announcement that Citigroup would be given a helping hand by the government, was the second such injection of cash in a span of a couple of months, and understandingly, people are pissed.
What’s more, NY politicians are pissed, as two Staten Island councilmen, Vincent M. Ignizio and James S. Oddo, have proposed renaming the stadium “Citi/Taxpayer field:”
“Perhaps a name change is in order, since it will be the taxpayers of the country who will foot the bill for not only part of stadium, but for the company itself,” Mr. Ignizio said. “The taxpayers are spending billions for this company to maintain its operations and deserve the recognition for their largess.”
Mr. Oddo quipped: “Not naming the field after Jackie Robinson in the first place: mindless. Tom Seaver stepping onto the new mound for the first time: timeless. Actually acknowledging the contributions of the hardworking taxpayer: priceless.”
Now, Taxpayer Field doesn’t have that nice of a ring to it, but it would be a more accurate reflection of the financing behind the stadium given the situation. Let’s follow the money: The construction of Citi Field is being subsidized with about $450 million in public funds, and now Citigroup is getting a shot in the arm of tax payer money, so yea, maybe a nod to taxpayers is in order. Stadium name changes aren’t unheard of, you are aware that Minute Maid Park was once called Enron Field?
Let’s put it up to a poll, shall we? Now that Citigroup is being rescued, it’s tentatively safe to asume it’ll stick around, but it’ll have the specter of the bailout hanging over its head:
Should the Mets change the name of their new stadium?
- Yes, call it People's Field or something alluding the double subsidy it got from taxpayers. (34%, 38 Votes)
- They should, but they won't cuz it's $400 million. Would you return $400 mil? (31%, 35 Votes)
- I don't give a crap what they call it; with this economy, I couldn't afford a hot dog in there! (24%, 27 Votes)
- No, Citi Field is fine as it is. (11%, 12 Votes)
Total Voters: 112
Comment now »
















